Proper Grammar Is Now Racist According To Taxpayer Funded Academia

Race baiters in colleges and government schools are now saying proper grammar is racist and an example of “colonialism” including major universities.  Official government programs are pushing for different standards for grammar and spelling to help “fight racism”.

You can see here at Denver’s Metropolitan State University and their course on “linguistic White Supremacy”, which was taken down shortly after our initial airing of this report but can be found in the wayback machine here: https://web.archive.org/web/20240302100906/https://www.msudenver.edu/writing-center/faculty-resources/linguistic-white-supremacy/

Cambridge is also joining the cry equating proper grammar to white supremacy: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/language-in-the-trump-era/perfect-english-and-white-supremacy/8704FAA92F598319245A53DA1D2A5FBC

You can find an endless number of reports from tax payer funded academia promoting the idea that saying certain spelling is right and other spelling is wrong, or that to mark a paper as grammatically incorrect if it includes a statement such as “Let me axe you a question.”, when “Let me ask you a question.” is what is meant.

This is part of a larger agenda of balkanization in an attempt to further destroy the Foundations of liberty America was based on. If you destroy the culture, you can easily rot a society from within.

Help support ad free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

TRANSCRIPT

Generated using A.I.; please forgive any mistakes.

For those of you that don't know me, I am not exactly what you'd call an expert in the English language of proper grammar, proper spelling. And Rod, though, is maybe what we'd consider a grammar nut. [laughter] You wanna see my armpit? [laughter] And so, you know, I'm like, "See, Rod, you're a racist," because there's these agencies that have come out that said, "This Committee Against Racism and Bias in the Teaching of English." And so what it is is basically what they're saying is that, saying that there's only one way to spell something or one way to write something, there's only one correct grammar, is actually a form of white supremacy, and it's linguistic white supremacy and racism. And so if you wanna be a good little anti-racist, you have to say that, you know, writing down saying, "I wanna ax you a question," is a legitimate way to speak or to write.

And that if you say, "No, that is improper English," now you're a white supremacist imposing your colonialism on minorities. So as the resident grammar Nazi, how do you feel about your white supremacy? Well, I think it's retarded, obviously. And what's kind of funny is, you know, I have some parental supervision software on my daughter, Simone. And sometimes it will send me, like, it'll flag something that's potentially violent or whatever, right? Harmful in some way. Yeah, harmful in some way. And almost 100% of the time, it's like when she was reading her scriptures, right? So what are they gonna do? What are they gonna, I mean, are they flagging black people when they're saying, "I'm gonna ax you"? Does that come up as a violent, potentially violent? Potentially violent. Oh, right, yeah, 'cause you're talking about, you know, axing somebody. So this isn't like some, like, extremist, you know, just some straight up, you know, Marxism.org.

This is a government-funded university. The people in the state of Colorado are paying for this organization. And, of course, and we've done videos about this before, but to start, this article on linguistic white supremacy says, "Racism and white supremacy exist in every facet of our society, including writing, grading, teaching, and university life. Scholars and activists alike have made it clear that in order to be an anti-racist, an individual must not just be against racism and white supremacy, but must be actively anti-racist or actively fighting racism and white supremacy." So it's not good enough for you to just say, "You know what? I think everybody should be treated fairly." That's racist. You have to be actively anti-racist according to this, you know, this insane movement. You have to be fighting racism. The word is "radicalize." Yeah, you're radical.

They want you radicalized. You can't just be like, "Hey, you know, I'm against that, and I'm not going to do it myself." That's not good enough. You have to be fighting it. And the way that they're fighting it is by calling it "linguistic white supremacy" to demand that there is a proper way to write and spell. Or to not even demand it, but just to say, "I'm going to grade you because—I'm going to give you a bad grade because you spelled those words wrong." That is white supremacy according to this insane movement. You don't know who these people are. These are the same people like they're behind what happened at the University of California in Davis within, I don't know, sometime within the past 10 years or so, where they changed their admissions to no longer take anything scholarly into account. They said it was purely based on race and those kinds of things.

So as far as the admissions to the college. Holy cow. That's never—in the history of the world, that's never been a thing. Because you want to help the people that are at the top of the spectrum to move on. You want to have the best people in your fields and whatever. But no, it's more important now that we have Black people there than that they're actually the best at what they do. I wonder what the ethnic ratio is at UC Davis because, you know, up until basically 20 years ago, UC Davis was basically this—it was white and Asian. That is like 95% of the attendance at UC Davis were those, you know, were people from—it was mostly Japan, but you had people from North Korea and—not North Korea, sorry, from Korea and from, you know, just a few from China. But it was from a Southeast Asian country and white people. That is—and so it's so funny that you would say that UC Davis is going in that direction.

Maybe they just felt they weren't diverse enough or they had to bring in people from—they had to get rid of those standards to be able to have a more diverse population. It's insane. And I know that you know a little bit about Davis, the area out there. Yeah. You want to know what race do you think or ethnicity do you think has the highest percentage at UC Davis? What would your guess be just having been there and walked around? Well, as of 2003, 2000—I'm sorry, 2023 and 2024, so just a year or so ago. It's been a while since I've been there, but if it's anywhere similar to what it was, you know, 20, 30 years ago, I would say it's, you know, 90% or maybe 80% white. And then the majority of the rest of it would be Asian of some kind. Okay.

So that is actually pretty close to my experience because I actually lived really close to Davis and dated a girl that was at UC Davis, so I was on the campus a lot. And I would agree with that. So here's what ChatGPT is telling me, and this is based on DataUSA. As of the 2023-2024 school year, 28.4% of the students at UC Davis were Asian. 23.2% were white. 22.7% Hispanic/Latino. That's totally different. And then from there, just, yeah, way, way, way different, right? And that doesn't represent the actual population in that area, which is so odd. Almost 30% of the student body is going to be Asian.

That's weird because nowhere, I lived in California for like 25 years. And like I said, I was in the UC Davis area for a little while there and Sacramento area pretty much that whole time. And there's not 30% of the population that's Asian, right? And so that's interesting because that's one of those things. Or Hispanic. Or Hispanic. That's true too. And that's one of those things that they try and push. When I attended Davis Senior High. Real quick, what I was going to say was that they tried to push, I'm trying to think of the term, but equitable representation, right?

So what's the actual percentage in the populace? And then make sure that they're represented in that percentage in the schools or whatever. That's not even what's happening here. And these are the same groups of people that came up with that nonsense. And they're not even doing their own thing. Sorry, what were you going to say? I was going to say, so when I attended Davis Senior High. So I grew up in this town of this university that has gone to this insane level. It was insane back then. And so when I go to more conservative areas, I'm like, I've been there.

I know what you're doing. I know where it leads. You don't want to do it. And so when I attended Davis Senior High, the population, I told you what I, you know, and I was pretty close of what the university was, which didn't even represent the town. So if you look at the town as a whole, it's 99, at least it was 90, 95 percent white. And then and then you and then you have the other ones, the pretty equal, maybe a little bit more Asian than others. But it was the the other minorities were all pretty equal. Very, very, very few Hispanics, very, very few blacks. And and then other you'd always have, you know, somebody from maybe like I had a girl from Japan and I had some there was a boy from Iran in my class in sixth grade. And so you had that kind of stuff. But generally speaking, 90 percent plus white.

And so just the fact that the university is going that far, you know, to to get it's at least the university itself. That is this part of this linguistic white supremacy. It's not enough just to be against racism. You have to you have to as yourself saying, I'm not going to participate in it. I'm not going to engage in that activity. I'm against it. That's not enough. They're saying that if you are not actively anti-racist, meaning you are fighting racism and in their way right here, they're saying you have to fight linguistic white supremacy or you are a racist. Yeah, it's not just that you aren't using the terms right, you're going to be up in the face of anybody else that is, which is nonsense. Because you're not we're not talking about people using the N word. Right. Right. What we're talking about here is people that say the word white is spelled W.H.I.T.E.

Instead of or or to your point earlier, ask is spelled A.S.K. not A.X. Right. Oh, no, you're a racist. No, there's language involved here. Right. And I expect long before any of your your racism nonsense. And this kind of nonsense is of yours to me leads to more of this. This it leads to the polarization where if you're saying I have to agree that there is no right way to spell something, no right way to write something or I'm a racist, then you're going to have a portion of the process. OK. And you feed what we were talking about earlier, where with the video, what's going on in Ireland, where people are just sick of it, they're like, OK, fine. Or Ireland is a white only country. We're not going to put up with it. And so I think that this kind of stuff that they're being so extremely anti-racist feeds racism. Yeah, that's absolutely the goal as well. Like I said, the point is to radicalize people. They want you in everybody's face and being violent and pushing an agenda without realizing you're pushing agenda because there's that whole. The false morality, right, that false morality that you portray to everybody and everybody wants to be seen as the good guy. So this is one way you can jump on that train.

So to be an anti-racist, you've got to be express the idea that racial groups are equal and none needs developing and is supporting policy that reduces racial inequality. So and none needs developing. That's see now that's really interesting. So I have I have Native American ancestry. I know it's cliche, but I'm actually descended from a couple of chiefs. You and Elizabeth. Yeah, right. Sequoia wasn't not a chief. He was a Cherokee who invented the alphabet for the Cherokees. He's one of my ancestors. Chief Emotional Atabi was one of the three primary chiefs of the Choctaw Nation. That's one of my ancestors. So I look back, though, at my people and we have a stupid Disney Hollywood nonsense view of the Indians and how they all lived in peace and talked to the trees and loved each other. That's utter bullcrap. Utter bullcrap. In fact, you and I have been working together, have worked together and done a little bit of studying in the history of Utah. And going back and reading that, you can read about how when the pioneers came to this area that is now Utah. Well, the Indians hated the different tribes, hated each other, were killing each other all the time. Not only that, though, there were these weird barbaric practices where like when one of the chiefs died, they killed some horses, some women and some children and threw them all in the pit with them when they buried him so that he wouldn't be alone on the other side.

Tell me that's not a group of people that needs development. That's just as valid as going to work and paying your taxes. Yeah, right. Exactly. No one needs development. And my point is, you and I had seen some videos, too, like six months ago or something, maybe even more recent than that, actually, of if you get on YouTube and look up this term black fatigue, you will find videos by black people talking about black fatigue and how not just other races, but even black people are getting tired of black people. And they're showing the videos of everybody beating each other up in Wal-Mart and all these things, you know, fighting in the streets of Disneyland and all this stuff. But one of those one of those videos, though, that we saw, they were it was a bunch of black guys watching a video doing a reaction video of a black preacher who was talking about, look at look at our people back in Africa, all these thousands of years later, they're still living in huts and stuff running around in loincloths.

Right. Or I mentioned earlier, tell me that the U.S. government just made a deal with the Navajo in Utah where, you know, 200 years later, if they gave up rights to the Colorado River, the federal government would dig wells for them. Like, yeah, give them running water. Yeah, exactly. And I actually lived on the Navajo reservation for a while. And yeah, people are having to take a truck into town to go fill up these big things of water to come back. Yeah. You think that's bad? If you think that these people need development, if you think that it's good that they brought them to this well, you're a racist. And it's insanity. OK, well, let's let's go. And it's true. Oh, good. Well, real quick, it's true that it's true that the government did stuff that caused problems that, you know, is part of the cause for what's going on here. But even prior to that is what we're talking about. Yeah. When when we when we came into the area, they were still living in mud huts and running around in their underwear. And that's I'm grateful as an ancestor of Native Americans.

I'm grateful that I live in a house and a bed and I have clothes because I've read text from the 16, 1700s, probably going back even further than that of from like the Spanish and others who came here and and interacted with the Indian tribes here. Hundreds of years ago, among my people, OK, these old documents talking about visiting my ancestors, talking about how they were living on beds that were just made out of sticks with leather tied across. OK, that's fine. The pioneers did that, too. But then about how they were just laying and lay in their bed and pee in their beds. And it would just drain through onto the ground. So I'm grateful for bathroom. Just as good as sleeping in a comfortable bed and going in a toilet. Come on. Yeah. Both is valid. Exactly. But yeah, it's it's just yeah. But there were policies that led to bad things, of course. But. There has been a long enough time and enough money going to these communities that they should have been able to dig their own well by now.