Member Training – Freedom From War

Member training from June 16th, 2025.

This presentation explores the largely overlooked disarmament agenda of the United States government, with a particular focus on State Department Document 7277, titled Freedom From War: The United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. This official plan, introduced under the Kennedy administration, outlines a multi-stage strategy to progressively disarm nations—beginning with significant reductions in military capabilities and culminating in the complete elimination of all national armed forces. Control over remaining armaments would be transferred to a strengthened United Nations peacekeeping apparatus. The presentation uncovers how this document not only aligns with globalist ambitions for a one-world government but also continues to influence U.S. foreign and defense policy under the radar of public awareness, making it a vital subject for those concerned with national sovereignty and constitutional liberty.

Help support ad free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

TRANSCRIPT

My dear Father in Heaven, we're very grateful that we can meet together as the Tree of Liberty Society and give thanks for this opportunity and the blessing that it is to be able to be trained each week and be able to learn important principles and teachings that will help us to claim our liberty and be able to do what is right and be brave and true in all that we do. Please be with Ben as he presents and all those that participate. Please help us to have our hearts and minds open to what is true and correct and to be able to make those changes that we are inspired to make that we can gain ground back for liberty and the principles that we need to change in our culture. We're so grateful for that goodness to us and even in our challenges, the many blessings that we receive. Let me say these things in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.

I'm really excited that Joyce agreed to talk to us tonight for a second. I just love her bubbly and positive personality. She's gone through the boot camp and we just did the last one this week, the one that's done face-to-face. She had some really neat insights and some comments that I really appreciated and thought would be helpful to you. And so, Joyce. All right. Give it over to you. The main thing is that I just thought I didn't need the boot camp. I looked at the subject headings and I was like, I know that stuff, you know, and but. Ben kept encouraging me and I kept asking dumb questions and having to have things explained during meetings.

And I was like, yeah, maybe I don't know something, you know. And also filling out the form before every meeting. Oops, I forgot to today. I had some distractions. But it really helped me to realize, yeah, I need to do this. I feel motivated to do something. Look at this. I'm not doing anything week after week. And so it helped me. I don't know. Somehow it helped my brain. to latch on to doing the next best thing for me. And then when I did it, it, the first one was great. The next one was better. The next one was even better. And I, they really were blowing my mind till five and six. I was just beside myself with how awesome they were. And I wanted to share it with everybody.

And now we can, and you know, not just members. And so anyways i want to highly recommend it to everybody especially if you think you know all the information i've been attending the meetings i think for the last year and a half yeah and and even after all of those trainings still seeing new stuff in the boot camp that's awesome so what are some things um maybe just one or two examples of things that, you know, just topics that you thought you knew about and what are some things that you, specifics that you learned? Oh, no. No, I didn't think of sharing that. Oh, I'm sorry. From the last one, I could, I could do the number six because it's the most recent in my head.

All the video clips of actual firsthand accounts of the hypocrisy of these people that I had thought were good and truthful and they really literally are saying one thing and doing another and you and now because history has passed we're even further away from it when you made those videos i'm like everybody has to see this the manual and some key points in that like i said we will we will be doing uh the importance of going over it on a regular basis every week we'll be spending a portion of training on it and so um that's that's what i'm going to be doing this is we're going to be covering the first section on growth it's important to understand the uh the importance of growth if you want the tree of liberty society to exist then you will do what you can to help us grow because if we're not growing we're dying and so that's something that's very very important And so I want to talk about some of the recruitment tactics of the Sons of Liberty going back to the beginning of the war for independence.

And I goofed up on some of the fading. But one of the things that they did was they carried out tactics of resistance. One example is tarring and feathering to intimidate loyalists and energized supporters. So our actions, the things that we're engaged with are effective in growing our organization. They distributed posters and pamphlets. And so we have books. We have our Slim Jims. We have pass along cards. We have our articles. We have our videos. That's a modern way we can apply the same idea of how they grew. Those are the same principles that we can follow for us to grow. They held public meetings. So we have our right now, we currently have scheduled on the website that you can send people links to. And when everyone's closest to them, they can go to them this Thursday. We're going to be out in Jueb County. And then next Tuesday, we'll be up in Utah County. And then if you want to organize your own, that's a way to do it.

Those are the things that they did. These are the things that we can do. They also use symbolic protests like hanging effigies. So a lot like their acts of resistance. These were things to intimidate and to show the things that should be done to people that are evil and working to destroy our liberty. So these are some real quick examples of historical examples that we can apply in modern times. This is an example of one of the articles that was written and one of these flyers that was within a newspaper called the Connecticut Journal. And it was talking about the Boston Tea Party. And it was written under a pseudonym under the name Joyce Jr.

And in it, it says you may depend that those odious miscreants and detestable tools to ministry and governor, the tea consignees, those traitors to their country, butchers who have done and are doing everything to murder and destroy all that shall stand in the way of their private interest, are determined to come and reside again in the town of Boston. I therefore give you this early notice that you may hold yourselves in readiness. on the shortest notice to give them such a reception as such ingrates deserve so they were promoting it they're saying hey this is something that's coming up and you know they were engaged they knew that they they couldn't just do it with what they had the people behind the um putting out the flyers they needed to grow they needed to have more people engaged and so they helped to get the word out they paid for articles they paid for ads they paid for flyers and to get the word out and to grow, to have more people engaged in their activities and being engaged in their activities, help them to grow their efforts in the in the Sons of Liberty. And so another aspect of this is that we have to acknowledging that growth is essential for survival. Recruiting has consistently been a primary focus of our agenda and the journey towards successful recruiting offers valuable benefits that extend beyond the crucial goal of expanding our membership. It's not just about growing membership, but that is a key part of it.

To win the monumental struggle that binds us together, we must expand our ranks. So it's not just about growing the organization. It's about getting more people engaged in our agenda. Through recruiting, you are not only sharing vital information, but also offering solutions to pressing issues. And that's a key thing is we are solving problems. We're not just here to complain about things. I hope that is clear in our trainings and in the articles and the videos that we do that, yes, we have to sometimes point out problems, but really what we're doing is we are offering solutions. These are the things that have been proven to work throughout time. And so if we just apply what works, we will have success. And that is what we are doing. We are providing solutions and we are solving problems.

So, and also regardless of the outcome. you will have provided knowledge and fostered understanding. So even if they maybe don't become members, you've at least planted seeds and you have hopefully as another part of that is even even if they're not a member, they're out there and they're a part of the army of informing others. We've maybe convinced them of the principles and they will go out there and promote those same principles. In doing so, you will have emphasized solutions which hold greater significance than the problems themselves. I say this, it's an important quote, is that what we are for has to be bigger and better than what we're against. And I really believe that even though we face a horrible conspiracy, what it is that we're trying to build is infinitely better than what we are against. And it is essential that we work towards building that. And our mission and aspirations must surpass and overshadow what we stand against.

So most effective growth, and this was just mentioned a minute ago, happens through our in-person presentations and activities. That's the most effective. That is not, I am not saying don't do other things. I am saying, you know, if you are able to do the most effective, do the most effective. But if not, then do the second most, you know, the thing that you're able to do. doing something is better than nothing if we are if it's in the line of following the agenda of the member manual so one example you can host a presentation or series in your home those are really good because they are the people that you know and it's a part of our like i i say in the manual and other places i've said that our job is to a either go off and organize together you know with people of like mind or create that where you are right now.

Help your neighbors understand these principles and start to live by them. And so hosting a presentation or series in your home can be the bootcamp. It can be something that you've seen us do and you're like, I want my friends to see this and I don't want them to just watch a video. I want them to be able to ask questions and be able to engage. I want to be able to recruit them for membership. And so I'm going to hold this in my home. Great way to do it. And then the other thing is that you can do as well is invite friends to an existing series. So most effective is to host your own and invite them to your home. Second most effective is, hey, we've got these two different presentations once a month. So invite them to those. And so both of these are not just the boot camp. It's just an ongoing series of different presentations. And so those are two different things that you can do along the lines of the most effective. So Mark, you have your hand raised.

Yes, if we gave a presentation on the boot camp at our home, how would you suggest we structure it? I would like to welcome questions. Do you suggest if they have a question, just stop it, address the question, and then go back to it? Do you suggest take automatic breaks every half hour, hour, go through the entire boot camp? How do you recommend that we present it? Yeah, especially in a home, it is much more welcoming to questions. And so if it's especially if it's like, hey, I need before I go on, I need to ask a question because I don't understand X. And so that's you know, that would be totally appropriate. But you're saying especially clarification questions. Right. But if it's something, you know, maybe more along the lines of a comment or something, they should write a note and wait for the end and talk about it afterwards. Thank you.

And then, you know, that would be the kind of structure. It could be like we did last time down in St. George, where it's all in one day, or we could schedule a thing where once a month I am able to come down. It just depends on the people that you were working with. The next thing is, I hope that we're excited about our unique mission. We are different. People say all the time, there's all these different freedom organizations, and we should just all come together. But really, the Tree of Liberty Society, we are extremely different and unique. And that uniqueness is what makes us effective in what we're doing because we're not just spinning our wheels, right? We are the first and only organization exposing how the international conspiracy is infiltrating local communities so that we can delegitimize those in power and increase advocacy and adherence to correct principles and not the edicts of satanic tyrants. There are very few people to begin with that even talk about the conspiracy. If they say deep state, that's their focus. They're not talking about the conspiracy.

That's the definition that the establishment has given to the deep state is simply the bureaucratic people, the people in the bureaucracy. That's not what we're talking about. This is a conspiracy that involves people in the bureaucracy as well as people in elected positions and positions in business, positions in religion. That is not the deep state. We're talking about a conspiracy. Very few people even talk about that. And then we are literally the only ones that have been able to document and expose that in a flushed out fashion so that they can see how they can identify the local conspirators. Yes, Mark. Yes. In case nobody knows or somebody doesn't know this, the term deep state was coined by the conspiracy. Yes. The press secretary for trump in his first year in office they started using that term it came straight from the trump administration from the conspiracy and she was asked what does that mean and her answer was oh it means leftovers from the obama administration this is almost word for word so that's obviously not the conspiracy so they're trying to protect the conspiracy by using that term uh even though some people in general kind of are referring to the conspiracy. Yeah, very few people using that term really understand it properly. You're right. Thank you.

So without this understanding, all of our action will be spinning our wheels at best, no matter how popular other organizations' pretended solutions might be. And that's on purpose. You have a lot of organizations that will, from time to time, receive a lot of publicity from your neocon and false opposition. radio hosts or you know person other social media personalities and it's designed to get you to spin your wheels at best, if not worse. And if we're not understanding correct principles, such as natural law, what we're for, and the principles of liberty, and we don't understand the conspiracy, we are only going to be spinning our wheels. And so I hope that if we understand that, if we start to really internalize that, we will get excited about our mission, how unique it is, and we will... really catch fire in trying to help others build that understanding and get them involved as well. And when you're at events where potentially like -minded people are at, that you have materials from the Tree of Liberty Society that will help build awareness of the society, as well as two principles of liberty and actionable steps they can take.

And so we have simple ones where we're just like, hey, here's a little pass-along card where you can go check out our website. Or we have these Slim Jims that have more details, including solutions. Of course, we have our books. And so if we're using those things and we have them on us when we're going to an event or some kind of activity where others that are likely to be like minded or could be like minded because they just need more information and then they will be like minded, then encourage you to either order materials from the website or to download it and send it to your local printer and print it off yourself. I don't care which one you do. We need to start getting excited and we need to start getting this material out to more people so that we can grow. So I guess before we do that, before we go into training, does anybody have any questions on this? So I guess before I ask for questions, I hope that you all spent the last week reading the manual.

And so starting this week to next Monday, you will read growth, the growth section. And then next week, you'll bring questions and maybe your own ideas on how to implement some of the items in the growth section. So next week, I'll take comments on the growth. So like reiterating what I said last week is that I hope that you've gone, you spent the last week to just go through the once read through of the entire book. the entire manual, and then in the next seven days to just go through the growth section, do your highlights, write down your questions, write down your thoughts, and we'll discuss those things next week. So before we move on, though, questions. Okay, let's move on then.

Okay, this week, freedom from war. It's an important thing, right? Of course, we are building understanding of and adherence to the principles that have built free nations. We are exposing this again, a conspiracy. And we are building an effective resistance to that conspiracy. So Iran is the globalist boogeyman. And we need to understand that, especially with a lot of the events that have happened this weekend. We look at this article from 17 years ago. This is not new. Cheney pushes Bush to act on Iran. President not prepared to leave the conflict unresolved. This is something they've been working on for a long time. We go to this one from 2004. Condoleezza Rice, another CFR member, says Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear arms. President Bush's National Security Advisor said Sunday that the United States and its allies cannot allow the Iranians to develop a nuclear weapon and warned that President Bush would look at all the tools that are available to him to stop Iran's program. Again, Iran is not allowed to have a nuclear weapon. We have here in 2012. Iran on the brink of nuclear bomb in six to seven months, says Netanyahu. This is 13 years ago. Another article from just two days ago was Iran months away from producing a nuclear bomb.

Benjamin Netanyahu declared that the operation was necessary to roll back the Iranian threat to Israel's very survival. He said Israel has acted because if not stopped, Iran could produce a nuclear weapon. a very short time okay so this is something this is the boogeyman for like 20 30 years Iran can't get a nuclear bomb now and they will always bring up these things about how Iran is a dictatorship Iran is you know they're they're a Muslim dictatorship and look at these horrible things that they do to women and children and and they are shouting death to America and death to Israel and so they're not allowed to have a nuclear bomb But who are the ones promoting this? We look at this and it's the CFR. It is the satanic conspiracy. It is members of it and the different roundtable groups associated with the conspiracy.

So why is the conspiracy so hell-bent on the idea of getting us, even if they don't go? Because maybe they've been talking about them being not allowed to have a nuclear weapon for a long time. So it might be just a distraction. where they don't ever plan on doing anything. But we need to understand what the real goal is of one nation saying another nation isn't allowed to have weapons. Ask yourself, what would you do if Iran said the United States is not allowed to have nuclear weapons anymore? Or what if Russia said it? Or what if England said it? Or what if Israel said it? If any other nation said America is not allowed to have nuclear weapons. we would tell them to pound sand, right? And so that's something we need to understand is the mentality, the mindset that they're trying to put into our heads of saying certain nations aren't allowed to defend themselves, okay? So who wants war with Iran? Of course, the satanic globalists want war with Iran.

And so we have to understand that as we look at the news. And the scare tactics they use to get us to support any kind of effort to ensure that Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons. And I think this meme, it's a meme, but it makes a great point. Iran wants war. Look how close they put their country to our military bases. Okay, so who wants war? War with Iran is an extension of the UN freedom from war agenda. So if you... This is something we haven't really talked about. I've talked about in passing in training before, but this is a State Department document, Freedom From War, the United States Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. This is State Department document 7277 released in September 1961. And so even though it was released in 1961, this is something that just a few years ago, the Former president of the John Birch Society, John McManus, asked a United States general if this was still the policy of the United States.

And they said, yes, it is still the policy of the United States. So what is the policy of the United States? What is this State Department document 7277? Let's go into it. It says to contain and reduce the nuclear threat states that have not acceded. to a treaty effectively prohibiting the testing of nuclear weapons shall do so. So and be the production of fissionable materials for use in weapons shall be stopped. Let me go back here. OK, so that is. That is the goal is to get it. So all nations without, and we're going to get into this in a minute, without approval from the United Nations is not allowed to produce these things. Next we go to, it says in stage two of this program, progressive controlled disarmament and continuously developing principles and procedures of international law would proceed to a point where no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened UN Peace Force. So that's one of the goals right there is to make sure that nobody is able to oppose the United Nations Army. And of course, they use Orwellian doublespeak where they call it a peace force.

It's the UN Army. No nation would be able to challenge the UN Army. That is the goal. The progressive steps to be taken during the final phase of the disarmament program would be directed toward the attainment of a world in which states would retain only those forces, non-nuclear armaments and establishments required for the purpose of maintaining internal order. They would also support and provide agreed manpower for a UN Peace Force. So either we don't develop anything above what we have or we start to get rid of anything that we would have. except for what's needed to quell any dissension against the new world order within our nation's borders. That's what they want to do is to make it so that's the only ability that a nation has. And then if they need help, then they can pull in the UN army to stop any kind of rebellion within a nation state. So they want to disarm people. And as a part of that is that they want to make it so that nations can't oppose the UN and that individuals can't oppose the tyrants within their own boundaries. Continuing on, it says the manufacture of armaments for internal use of a nation would be prohibited except for those agreed types and quantities to be used by the UN Peace Force and those required to maintain internal order. So again, you're only allowed to have weapons for internal order or to produce them to give over to the United Nations.

All other armaments would be destroyed or converted to peaceful purposes. And just like all good communists, peace means not opposing the New World Order. So this is the current policy, as I mentioned earlier, of both the United Nations and the United States. And the conspiracy's goal is to disarm individuals and nations of weapons that would enable them to defend themselves. and to declare war on anyone not in compliance. Any questions before I move on to the next area? Mark. So what you're describing is exactly what's going on in Iran.

As you pointed out earlier, the United States and joint partnership with Israel is saying, you have no sovereignty in this respect. we can decide what weapons you have to defend yourself what weapons you can't and we're going to implement execute this edict by force and by uh death and by uh killing uh you folks until you buckle under and uh i think it's real important that if to look at that principle clearly the principle there is that other nations and and the un according to the document uh public uh state department document public uh 27 or 7277 is that uh the un will be able to disarm any nation in the world uh so that they can't compete with the military the united nations and also the principle applies to individuals so if government has a right to disarm nations then government has a right to disarm, in principle, individuals. Do you agree with that? Well, that's what they've said. Absolutely. Yes. Thank you. Joyce, you got your hand up.

And isn't it in the Constitution that our standing army of the United States isn't allowed to attack its own citizens or something like that? Sorry. Well, posse comitatus. It's a law passed by Congress after the war between the states. And it was made so that we wouldn't have an army going against the American people. So that's the concept. But we see that being violated with the Marines being sent out to American cities and things along those lines. Isn't it the way to prevent unrest of the citizenry is to make sure they're prosperous? I mean, let them be prosperous. Let them grow food and have freedom. People don't get an unrest if they're not. Oppressed. Yeah. The most important word is freedom there. Yeah. In answer to your question, Ben answered it from a statute law. It specifically says, and there's multiple posse convitatus law. The first one was 1878. And they kept adding to it, adding to it. And it specifically says the Marines can never be used on domestic. uh activities inside any state in america and yet that's what trump actually did is to flaunt that law but it's going back to the constitution the constitution that does not authorize the president in any way to uh use a military inside any state so it's two ways it's illegal statute law and constitutionally uh the provisions for uh insurrection and so forth and of course this is not insurrection anyway are congressional legislator powers.

They're not executive branch powers. So all this is illegal. This is a terrible, by definition, an outlaw. And we need to be pointing that out. He should be impeached immediately by Congress over this. But of course, the Republican Congress is sending back and letting him be a dictator. Yeah, they would never do that. Well, this document is shocking. Absolutely shocking. 1961 and is still enforced. Amazing. At least 40 years we know it has been, and there's no reason to believe it isn't still. Well, we can see that it's being implemented with what's going on with Israel. And so for us to understand, and this isn't just about Israel and Iran, this is to apply anywhere. And really the fundamental principle is the right of self -defense. And that's why really I want us to understand is whether we like what somebody else does or not. Like if my neighbor goes to a church that I don't like. that doesn't mean I get to go over there and take away his guns. If he's taking away somebody's life, liberty, or property, then yeah, they should go on trial and they should be punished for it.

But you can't just, because you don't like it, you just, there is the law of nations. And that's really what we need to understand. The law of nations. It was written in 1758. It was something that the founding fathers read. Can I just mention one thing on the document for those who are interested? Yeah, go ahead. You can get it online for free. It's only 17 pages. And as much as you covered, there's much more in there. So just put in either Freedom From War or U.S. Department Publication. is a great place to grab it. But the point is the right of self-defense. You can't just go and claim that your neighbor is doing something you don't like and take away their guns. Self-defense against unjust violence is not only the right, but the duty of a nation and one of her most sacred duties. In such case, those whom he attacks may repel him. Self-defense being authorized by the law of nature. The right of self-defense naturally belongs to everyone and requires no permission.

We don't need to go to the UN if somebody attacks us to get permission to defend ourselves. As an individual, you don't need to go and call the police and say, I'm being robbed. Can I defend myself? It is a natural right. And anyone that tries to take it away from you is a tyrant. And what's interesting is that this is talking about nations. Of course, individuals have the same right. But nations have that right as well. The right of self-defense is found also in Cato's letters, another important document, the set of books that the Founding Fathers read and quoted from, says the great principle of self-preservation, which is the first and fundamental law of nature, calls for this procedure. The security of commonwealth depends on it. The very being of government makes it necessary. And whatever is necessary to the public safety is just.

So self-preservation is just. It is something that is inherent. All men have a right to defend themselves. It is a maxim of the law that whatever we do in the way and for the ends of self-defense, we lawfully do. There is no law that can be legitimately passed that prevents you from defending yourself. Whoever violates this primary law of nature ought by the law of nature to be destroyed. So I like that. They're not just stopped. Anybody trying to take away your right to self-defense should be destroyed. Now, we apply that to, you know, we don't want to have the attitude of, you know, self-defense for me, but not for thee. And so we apply that anywhere. Anywhere this principle is out there. Somebody is saying that somebody else doesn't have the right to defend themselves. They're wrong and they should be destroyed.

Joseph Smith, in a letter to his wife in 1844, said there is one principle which is eternal. It is the duty of all men to protect their lives and the lives of their household whenever necessity requires. And no power has a right to forbid it. So he's again repeating what we see in these other places where nobody has the right to take this away from any individual or any group of individuals. This is an inherent right. In another talk that he gave, he says, while we will be the last to oppress, we will be the last to be driven from our post. Peace be still, bury the hatchet and the sword. Any man who will not fight for his wife and children is a coward and a bastard. Pretty strong words. I really like the way he put that because it shows that it's not just a right, but that it's a duty that we have. was mentioned in one of the earlier documents, I think it was Cato's letters.

An individual has the duty to defend his wife and his children and himself, and a nation has the duty to defend itself against aggression. And if you're not, you're a coward and a bastard. And he's using it in a critical way. He's using it in an epithet way. saying that you don't have a father. He's calling names. He's calling you a horrible person if that's what you're going to do. George Buchanan said that it is also for your salvation to equip yourselves. Now I will tell you I have about a hundred shots on the hand all the time. Three or four 15 shooters and three or four revolvers right in the room where I sleep. If you will lay a bowie knife or a loaded revolver under your pillow every night, you will not have many unpleasant dreams, nor be troubled with the nightmare. For there is nothing that the devil is so much afraid of as a weapon of death.

Let us be ready, guns cocked, none of your half cocked. So I love that because that's what we talked about in, especially in boot camp six and seven. is about how the conspiracy fears self-defense. That's why they work to ban guns. That's why they work to promote the lie of peaceful resistance because they are afraid of people defending themselves. Yeah, that was, I don't know, in the questions, some religious leader just said, oh, just said recently that gun laws, gun control laws are not strong enough. I'm not sure about just recently, but I heard, I know that. A man by the name of Dallin H. Oak said it a few years ago. Philip, are you thinking of somebody else? Maybe not.

I don't know. Philip? Lost you. Oh, can you not hear me, Philip? Because I can hear you. Yeah, I don't know where my thing went. I don't know if it's true or not. Somebody just shared it, that the president of the LDS Church just said that gun control laws weren't strong enough. I'm trying to find the link, but I'll see if I can find it and post it. Okay, thank you. Brigham Young said, By what means did God keep the mob from destroying us? It was by means of being well armed with the weapons of death to send them to hell cross lots. We must be so prepared that they dare not come to us in a hostile manner without being assured they will meet a vigorous resistance. And ten to one, they will meet their grave. I am my own policeman and have slept scores of nights with my gun and sword on my side.

That is if I slept at all. I'm still a policeman. Now is the day to watch. Now, this brings up a point that I've done trainings before in the past of how the idea of the modern local police is a modern invention. The first police department in the nation or in the union didn't exist until the 1840s. And so it really didn't become normalized until we get into the early 1900s of every town having a local police department. And it's literally the definition of a standing army. And so this is what policemen were back in the days that we were a little bit more free. We were responsible for defending ourselves against mobs, whether they be mobs, you know, mob mentality in a local community. or the mobs of nations preventing an individual nation from defending itself. And so when we lend our support to preventing or denying any nation or person the right to defend themselves, we are supporting the satanic conspiracies agenda of disarmament, not only for our perceived enemies, but for ourselves, because that is the goal, as we saw. is the disarmament of nations. And so as we see world leaders saying X country cannot be allowed to own nukes, they are following this State Department document.

So you can say that they are either knowingly or ignorantly, but most likely if they are in positions of power in government, they are knowingly implementing the New World Order agenda of only allowing the United Nations to have weapons, unless it's just enough to quell any kind of rebellion within their borders. And so we need to really understand these things because right now you have so many people acting emotionally where they're like, oh, we just have to support this tranny nation Israel claiming to be Israel when it's not. You know, we have to stop these bad guys that do, you know, they have a religion that I really don't like and they're doing things that I really don't like. And so. They can't be allowed to have it. Oh, look at them. They're shouting death to me. We have the right to defend ourselves.

If they ever attack us, we should defend ourselves. And they have the right to defend themselves. If somebody attacks them, they have every right to defend themselves. I will protect everyone's right to defend themselves. Mark, yes. I think you're muted, Mark. Yep, you're still muted, Mark. Yeah, there. yeah two points quickly uh enslavement and disarmament go hand in hand and and so that's ultimately what he disarms to enslave and so any church that uh says that it's pretty simple logic is really advocating the enslavement of mankind i don't think there's much in that as a christian but the one last point was on israel iran the arguments all over the uh conservative republicans uh conspiracy side of the media are twofold one is you they should be killed because of their thoughts the thought that oh israel should be removed from the uh nationhood that thought is be a talk show host everywhere from fox all over every establishment republican promoting talk show is echoing that you can kill somebody because of their thoughts the other one is even worse you can kill them because oh that's their thoughts the thought is that they want to they want to and the other one is speech that they say they want to and the other but some of those talk shows are actually saying well they they want to and they say it in such a way it's their thought so you should kill because of a thought that, of course, they have no idea what the real thought is.

And it doesn't matter how bad the thought is, nobody should be killed or murdered for their thoughts. Yeah. And if you actually read their comments in context of they should be wiped off the map, it's they, of course, all of the neocon radio talk show hosts always say that that means that they want a new Holocaust. They want to just, you know, they want to gas every Jew. Well, that's not what it is. They just think that it's an illegitimate nation because of its foundations and because of the war crimes that it's engaged in. That's what they're talking about. They're just saying that they shouldn't be allowed to do those things anymore. But my point is they could really sincerely want that, but that is no grounds to murder somebody. Sure, yes, you're right. So what is the founding fathers' position on engaging in other nations and what they're doing? What do we allow them to do? What don't we allow them to do? It's really encapsulated in the words of John Quincy Adams.

The idea of just mind our own business. And he said, but she, meaning America, goes not abroad in search for monsters to destroy. She is the well -wisher to the freedom and independence of all. You can always find a nation or a group of people that are saying something that you don't like. And it's easy to find monsters that you want to go out and stop them from promoting whatever they're saying. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. We do not vindicate or champion anybody else's cause. She will recommend the general cause by the countenance of her voice and the benignant... sympathy of her example. She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence. So we're not even out there to go and help other countries become independent. She would involve herself beyond the power of extrication in all the wars of interest and entry of individual avarice, envy, and ambition. which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom. The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force.

No matter what the great argument is that somebody will have of why that needs to happen, the natural result down the road will be force. And that's what we're seeing right now. It's the implementation of the United Nations. programmed to disarm the world and only allow the UN to be able to control the weapons of the world and so that there can be no resistance to their tyranny. And so it's important that we understand these principles, not just for what's going on right now. I just bring this up because of things that are going on and so that we are aware and that we can beware of the lies that are being promoted by so-called conservatives. Anybody saying that we need to go in and stop Iran from having nuclear weapons is a part of the New World Order. They are promoting the program of the New World Order and them promoting the idea of not allowing Iran to have weapons says that they should no longer be treated seriously and that they expose themselves as being a mouthpiece of the conspiracy. And so I hope that we recognize that and understand that. their lives anymore. So that's what we have for training. It's 10 o'clock. We can talk more about it if you'd like, if you have questions in open forum. Let's go ahead and have a closing prayer. And I would like to invite Rod, if you're available, to do the closing prayer for us.

Heavenly Father, we're grateful once again we'll be able to meet tonight and discuss freedom, liberty, and truth. We ask you to help us to remember these things. and to be vigilant and to be diligent in sharing these things with others and helping people to come to an understanding so that we may join together with our fellow citizens to stand up against the tyranny that we face in the world today. And we ask you to help us in our endeavors to bring to light the hidden things of darkness in the world around us. And we say these things in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen. Amen. Thank you, Rod.