Member Training – Civil Rights Movement Exposed! Part 2

Member training from January 5th 2026.

Rod finishes up exposing the lies of the Civil Rights movement and how it effects us to this day and why it should be opposed and repealed.

Help support ad free content with a one time donation or becoming a member today.

TRANSCRIPT

Generated using A.I.; please forgive any mistakes.

Our Father in heaven, we are grateful to come together tonight and ask for thy blessings to be with us as both Ben and Rod direct and present these instructions to us. May our minds be enlightened and we receive these things of thy spirit to impress them upon us. We might have the understanding that is needed of the conspiracy. and the evils that are amongst us in this world. Help us to do all we can to put it down and to try to prepare and to qualify ourselves to build up thy kingdom. Bless and be with us this night, we ask in the name of thy Son, Jesus Christ. Amen. Amen. There we go right there. So this is part two of the true story of civil rights. And obviously, as was mentioned, we're continuing with... Alan Stang's book, It's Very Simple, The True Story of Civil Rights from 1965. Now you might remember from last time Michael, quote unquote, Martin Luther King, stated publicly that he was sick and tired of people saying this movement has been infiltrated by communists and communist sympathizers. There are as many communists in this freedom movement as there are Eskimos in Florida, close quote.

So I want to remind you of this because This is something that Stang goes back to time and again throughout the remainder of the book here. So just keep that in mind. Look at this denial. There's as many communists in this freedom movement as there are Eskimos in Florida. We'll see whether or not that's true. We're continuing now, obviously, with part eight of the book, United Nations. A little bit of this might be familiar from last week, but I updated some of the content. And so we're going to just review it a little bit as we go. So Stang begins this chapter by pointing out that while things seem to be going well for the communists. They know they can't just go around killing everyone, as they've done in much smaller countries. There are too many Americans who will fight back. So where can they turn for support? Well, the communists started appealing to the UN to intercede in American affairs. Why? Because it's filled with representatives from socialists and communist nations, right? If you know anything about it, you know that that's a fact. Stang points out that the UN opposed self-determination when the nation of Katanga seceded from Congo. And this was because they were... led by an anti-communist, Moise Kapent Tshombe on the left there.

It wasn't one of their quote -unquote wars of national liberation. We are reminded by staying of the emphasis that Lenin and Stalin placed on using this tactic only when it was expedient to further global communism. So sometimes they like it, sometimes they don't, depending on who it is and what the goals are that they're achieving. A quote from a communist pamphlet at this point in the book discusses how much better off blacks would be if they were allowed to separate from the United States. And Stang points out that what this is all leading to is using this quote unquote national liberation to break up the United States so that it would become more manageable. They can't take it over as a large entity that's banded together. States united, and so they've got to separate them. We learned that an organization called the National Negro Congress petitioned the UN in May 1947 on behalf of 13 million oppressed Negro citizens of the United States of America. They claimed that the UN Charter gave the UN jurisdiction to act within the United States. The article referenced contains the communist phrase self-determination, as was mentioned in the notes there. The staff and petitioners of the National Negro Congress are all communists.

And Stan clarifies that since the UN has jurisdiction only over international disputes, it is implicit in this petition that the dispute is between the Negro nation and the United States. Remember, we talked last time about how they've got to convince a group of people that they are an oppressed nation within a nation so that they will want. to be freed right become their own thing next staying teaches us about the genocide convention adopted by the un in 1948 which defines genocide to no longer mean just the destruction of an entire race but any killings on the basis of race or killing members of the group somehow also causing serious bodily harm or mental harm to members of the group is genocide The petition points out that the Convention on Genocide is part of the United States law since the U.S. has accepted the Covenant of the United Nations. This gives them the right to intercede in America. Malcolm X threatened to take the plight of the Blacks to the U.N., and Jesse Gray, who organized one of the riots in New York, also organized a rally at the U.N. building to demand U.N. intervention. And of course, Stang reminds us, just because someone asked for something doesn't mean they'll get it. But in this case, They did, of course. The U.S. assigned a gentleman by the name of Morris B. Abram to a U.N. subcommission on prevention of discrimination and protection of minorities, which drafted a treaty to ban all forms of racial bias. The sinister fact is that the treaty and the International Civil Rights Court are part of a backstage State Department plan to link the racial problem in the U.S. with that in Africa and then put final jurisdiction under the U.N. This chapter opens with a quotation from someone in the Communist Party of Canada, wherein he refers to, quote, the socialist revolution in a massive struggle for democracy, close quote.

Now, we've made this point before, but it can't be stressed enough that the United States is a union of constitutional republics. and is not a democracy as we've all been taught in public school. Democracy is being pushed precisely because it is a necessary step towards communism, which itself always claims to be a movement of the people, right? That's why, again, you've got the hammer and the sickle on the flag. Perhaps this will clarify what is meant when U.S. presidents speak of, quote, making the world safe for democracy through their ongoing wars. Also in the opening paragraphs, the author mentions the communists being successful in setting every sort of person against every other sort of person. Jews against Christians, Negroes against whites, Mississippians against New Yorkers, women against men. It's important to keep this in mind as you consider the world as you understand it. Today, in fact, we would add to this list gays against straights, Christians against Muslims, right-wingers against left-wingers, and so on. divide and conquer is of course a very successful tactic that's why they've been using it for over 100 years one of the tricks employed by the powers that be is to redefine words and to use words as weapons the redefinition of genocide to mean physical or mental harm to a member of a group is clearly a fine example here more recently we've seen dna modifying gene editing procedures become vaccines and a peaceful protest at the Capitol building become a violent assault. And I would add to that list also, we've seen violent protests classified as quote unquote peaceful assemblies, right? These definitions and redefinitions have a subconscious effect on uncritical hearers, people that it just goes in one ear and out the other, and they just kind of take it as they hear it. A treaty to end all racial bias is nothing but a thought crimes law, no matter your own feelings on race. There's no two ways about it. Hey, Rob. Also, yo. I didn't mean to interrupt you, but I just wanted to make sure that it was changing slides when it was supposed to. We're still on the United Nations Commission. Okay. Just want to make sure. Thanks. Yep.

Because we're at the very end of this section. So I'm just kind of recapping a couple of things and bringing it up to date before we go to the next part. Okay. Got it. Thank you. Yep. So the last note that I wanted to say was just imagine my surprise when I was reading this chapter that I discovered the name of a man by the name of Albert Kahn in the list of petitioners from the Communist Civil Rights Congress to the UN. Because we talked about him back in part four last week and about his recorded conversation with Jim Jones's People's Temple. So once again, it's all the same people coming up over and over and over again, all these organizations, all the things that they're doing. It's all the same. People. Part nine, life among the Eskimos. So here's a quote from the executive director of the National Urban League. He says, the white leadership must be honest enough to grant that throughout our history, there has existed a special privileged class of citizens who received preferential treatment. That class was white. Now, if that doesn't sound like that came out of a 2025 college class, I don't know what would. So this chapter begins with a discussion about how quote-unquote self-determination and so -called civil rights might seem to be conflicting goals, but the communists themselves explain that they work together. The violent self-determination crowd provides a juxtaposing threat if the quote-unquote non-violent blacks don't get their way, at which point the non-violent individuals would be led to violence.

We'll get into this more in just a little bit here. We're provided with several quotes where this is threatened. What is important to observe is that the two strategies advance like legs on the same man. The one group couldn't get by without the other. The executive director of the National Urban League, whose quote we read at the opening of this chapter, also called for businesses to choose blacks over whites in hiring. Again, that sounds like 2025 to me. Elijah Muhammad of the Black Muslims called for equal employment opportunity now. Before going to Cairo, as we discussed last week, Malcolm X, the violent revolutionary, started a group called Organization for Afro-American Unity with himself as chairman and a whole host of quote-unquote nonviolence as members. Stang points out that we were given Malcolm X. as the leading symbol of the violent blacks, and Martin Luther King as the only man who can save us from Malcolm X. Again, the two legs on the same man. In 1938, an organization called the Southern Conference for Human Welfare was started by the communists. In Political Affairs magazine, they complained that most blacks didn't care about their pitch for self-determination and that those who took the time to learn what it actually meant generally voiced very decided opposition. They realized that they would have to trick blacks into supporting their cause, which led them to develop the strategy of creating communist front organizations, either infiltrating an existing organization and eventually capturing it, or starting an organization and inviting unwitting people to join. Either way, unsuspecting Americans wind up working to further some specific communist objective. In their publications, they compare this to the siege of Troy via the Trojan horse, as you can see in the picture here. In other words, keep the Negroes under the impression that the campaign has something to do with what they want, when all along it has only to do with communism. Some communists, however, couldn't keep their mouths shut and made public statements that the communists may justly claim to have laid the foundation for these great social movements.

Kind of a hearkening to... the gentleman who wrote, uh, Oh my goodness. Who was the dude Ben that, uh, studied with the conspiracy and then wrote the book that, uh, Carol, Carol Quigley. Oh, Carol Quigley. Yeah. Hope and tragedy. That's what I was thinking of. Exactly. Very similar. Tragedy and hope. I apologize. And there, there's just people that just can't keep their mouth shut. They're so excited. This is, we're doing it, you know, we're winning. And so we just got to talk about it. So this was specifically stated in reference to the Southern conference for human welfare. A 1955 Senate report discovered that it was conceived, financed, and set up by the Communist Party in 1938 as a mass organization to promote communism throughout the southern states. This meant that the Southern Conference had to be publicly abolished, but mysteriously, a new organization popped up, having the same address as the Southern Conference for Human Welfare, but now called the Southern Conference Educational Fund. They published a newspaper with the same title as the one that the Southern Conference for Human Welfare had, and they had basically the same officers. They were obviously the same organization. Mr. Stang provides background on just some of the members of the SCEF, all of them known communists convicted of felonies involving dynamite and or indicted for sedition or other illegal activities.

Just prior to the writing of this book, the president of the Southern Conference Educational Fund, Aubrey Williams, stepped down to become director of the National Youth Administration under Teddy Roosevelt, where he was Lyndon Johnson's boss. All this even after he was found to be a known communist by the Senate in 1945, which rejected his appointment as administrator of the Rural Electrification Administration and... after he appeared before the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee in 1954 and testified that the United States should, quote, defend the right of any communist to maintain his position as an employee of the government of the United States, close quote. Notably, President Johnson called on Aubrey Williams at his home just after the assassination of President Kennedy. His group, the SCEF, was earlier in the chapter, shown to have connections to another communist front group that sponsored Lee Harvey Oswald. The author points out that at the time of writing, the current president of the SCEF, that Southern Conference Educational Fund, was a Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, a former convict associated with several communist front organizations. You'll want to remember his name, Fred Shuttlesworth, because he's going to come up again very soon.

We're next treated to several other examples of religious colleges, schools, and so forth, all started by communists to be run as front organizations, including the Commonwealth College in Arkansas, which was closed for being a communist front. And you can see here the college's founders were members of the Socialist Party of America, even Wikipedia admits. Soon thereafter, the Highlander Folk School in Tennessee was opened by the same people who ran Commonwealth College. It enjoyed the involvement of President Johnson's friend Aubrey Williams, as well as advocating revolution and in recruiting students into the Young Communist League. The state of Tennessee succeeded in closing the Highlander Folk School in 1960. The Atlanta Constitution reported that one of the officers was under indictment on a charge. of filing a false non-communist affidavit. Of course, the next year, a Highlander Research and Educational Center opened in Tennessee, run by the same people. You can see how, just like cockroaches, these people scatter when the light is shown on them, and then they regroup when they think no one's looking. Next, we learn about a guy named Hunter Pitts Odell, who was called to testify before the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee.

The subcommittee had learned that American communists sought to infiltrate labor unions, churches, farmer organizations, parent-teacher organizations, channels of public opinion, and other streams of influence in our society. Mr. O'Dell pled the fifth and refused to say whether he was a communist. This was in 1956. He again declined to state in 1958. But in 1962, the House Committee on Un-American Activities released a list of people elected to the National Committee of the Communist Party, and Hunter Pitts O'Dell was on this list. Mr. O'Dell apparently also found time to do some work for the Dorchester Center, again, a name you'll hear again, which is operated out of the Mine, Mill, and Smelter by the Reverend Andrew Young, who is operated out of the Highlander School of Monteagle, Tennessee, all Communist Front organizations. This guy's important here. We next learn of a man named Bayard Rustin, who was a member of the Young Communist League for several years. He claimed that he never became a communist because the Communist Party was, quote, ultra suspicious of young college students and had little confidence in their reliability, close quote. But this is interesting, considering that the Young Communist League was created with the sole purpose of recruiting young college students into the Communist Party. According to the FBI, Bayard Rustin was involved in several socialist and communist groups. He was also active in a group called the American Forum for Socialist Education, which is communist dominated.

He spoke at a New York college alongside the foreign editor of the Daily Worker, a man from the Socialist Labor Party, and a woman from the Socialist Workers Party. Although he attended the... 16th national convention of the communist party of the united states as an official non-communist observer he is identified in fellowship magazine as a friend of kwame nakruma the communist dictator of ghana and of working to establish a center for non-violence at dar el salam tanzania where communist troops were known to be in training at the time the book was written he has denied having ever been a member of the communist party this is what we call plausible deniability and of course it doesn't matter right by their fruits you shall know them just like mike martin luther king has never been shown to be a card-carrying communist but he was surrounded by them everywhere he went hired fired and rehired them and always served the self-same ends again the fruits by their fruits you shall know them it's important to note that the communist plan for american blacks necessarily includes their remaining in ghettos because in the segregated black community, the illusion of a black nation within a surrounding and hostile white nation takes on a semblance of reality, right? If they're living here amongst everybody and they're doing just as well as everybody else, that illusion goes away. Interestingly, we see in this chapter, the communist origins of the white privilege claim that has recently begun to be taught in colleges and universities.

This claim is, of course, nonsense for many different reasons, not the least of which is that despite their white skin, even predominantly white groups like the Irish and Mormons were violently discriminated against in this country. Throughout history, we see that many groups have integrated into society via gradual, peaceful means, and this was already well underway for blacks at the time the communists were trying to do this. We should also note the call for preferential treatment in hiring. This has been implemented at least partially through passage of the so-called Equal Employment Opportunity Act. Likewise, we've seen colleges and universities like the University of California at Davis change their admissions process to make race allowable as a sole defining factor, completely disregarding prior academic standing. While one might wish to see blacks considered for employment equally alongside people of every other race, we must remember that in any constitutional republic, the government does not have the authority to dictate who you hire. You do not own your business if someone else dictates how it is run. A free man has freedom of association, whereby he may decide such things for himself. We must remember that freedom only exists where there is agency, and that means that people might make decisions that we disagree with. Importantly, it's mentioned in this chapter that JFK's lone gunman, Lee Harvey Oswald, was a member of a communist group called the Fair Play for Cuba Committee.

Also of note is the fact that the Southern Conference Educational Fund was still in operation when the author wrote this book and was not dissolved until 1981. One of the things that stands out in this chapter is the number of communists who identify as reverends. We talked about this a little bit last week as well. This fits fully into the general point of the chapter, which is that the communists have had to operate under different cloaks of falsehood in order to dupe people into supporting partial agendas of communism. And you might also recall the role of church leaders during the fake pandemic. It's just a tactic that they have found to be successful. Part 10, King of the Eskimos. Here we go. According to Stang, in October 1962, King turned up in a Harlem hotel suite with communist bank bandit Ahmed Ben Bella, another violent, after which they joined in a statement that the two injustices of colonialism and American segregation were linked. And at the beginning of this chapter, we're greeted with this comforting message from the original RFK. He said, based on all available information from the FBI and other sources, we have no evidence that any of the top leaders of the major civil rights groups are communists or communist controlled. This is true as to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., about whom particular accusations were made, as well as other leaders. Stang, however, points out that Rosa Parks was trained at the Highlander Folk School, which has previously been identified as a communist front. And this is the well-known incident that put MLK in the public spotlight for civil rights. We also learn in this chapter that Dr. King did his work at the head of an organization by the name of the Montgomery Improvement Association. The Montgomery Improvement Association had been formed by, here we go, the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, president of the Communist Front Group, the Southern Conference Educational Fund, discussed in the previous chapter.

That same year, Bayard Rustin, another known communist, was also hired on as MLK's secretary and advisor in this organization. We're provided with a quotation from... official Gil Green, who calls for, quote, units in the church youth organizations because in the South, especially for the Negro youth, the church is the center of all cultural and social activity, close quote. There's another quote from author William Nolan stating that, quote, the leading force among the Negro is the ministers and that no movements will succeed among the masses, which has not the approval of the Negro clergy, close quote. In March of 1957, after the Rosa Parks incident, MLK, Rustin, and Shuttlesworth formed the Southern Christian Leadership Conference. It couldn't have been formed just a month earlier, Stang informs us, because Mr. Rustin, Dr. King's quote-unquote secretary, was then attending the 16th Annual Convention of the Communist Party. He then reiterates that MLK is the president of the SCLC. And the vice president is Fred Shuttlesworth, who's also the president of the SCEF, which is a communist front, and whose field director, Carl Braden, is a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba committee, which is also a communist front. He also reminds us that the program director for the SCLC is the Reverend Andrew Young, who is also the administrator of the Dorchester Center, which is part of SCLS. and which uses the offices rent-free of the communist infiltrated mine mill and smelter workers.

The Reverend Andrew Young was trained at the Highlander Folk School. Note again how all of these organizations are tightly interwoven. Same people time and time again. They have all these different organizational names, so it sounds like lots of people are involved, but it's literally just a handful of people behind the scenes. Now, also that year, Rosa Parks, MLK, and others. were famously photographed in attendance at a workshop at the Highlander School, where MLK praised Communists Miles Horton and Aubrey Williams, who were also present, as was Abner W. Berry, of the Central Committee of the Communist Party, a definite violent. When the Highlander School was reopened under another name, MLK was listed as a sponsor by Director Horton in the official announcement. Later, MLK wrote a letter to Carl and Ann Braden, known communists with an affinity for violence already prior to this point, and urges them to become permanently associated with the SCLC. There's another letter from MLK to James A. Dombrowski, Communist Party leader, discussing how happy he was to have him stay at his home. MLK wrote a lengthy affidavit to the federal court in New Orleans, supporting the character of Dombrowski. Jack Rogers of the Louisiana Committee on Un-American Activities sent him three copies of their report on the SCEF and asked him to file an official statement with their own committee if he had knowledge that contradicted their findings. But MLK took no action, of course. Stang tells us that a photograph exists which shows the Reverend Dr. King alone with Ann Braden, Carl Braden, and James Dombrowski. The back of which reads as follows in Dombrowski's handwriting, the sixth annual conference of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

The Louisiana committee also had a check from the SCEF to MLK signed by Benjamin E. Smith and James A. Dombrowski for quote, New York expenses. So again, we're talking about all these little bitty things that pile up to show the relationships that he had with known communists. and the level of the relationships. They're paying for his New York expenses. They're attending conferences together, et cetera, et cetera. Bayard Rustin quit working for MLK in 1960, at which time he hired Hunter Pitts O'Dell, who had been known as an important communist official for four years. The following year, he was identified as a member of the National Committee of the Communist Party, like we talked about earlier. The newspapers pointed this out. MLK fired him, claiming he thought he had renounced his ways. Odell went to work at the Dorchester Center run by Andrew Young and then over to work for MLK again at the Southern Christian Leadership Conference until he was discovered again by the press and fired again. Again, I want to bring to mind the cockroach imagery I mentioned earlier. You shine a light, they all scatter, then they get back together again in the dark. At this point in the chapter, we learn of instances where MLK was praised by violent communist Benjamin J. Davis, as well as the communist newspaper The Worker. And we read of a letter MLK sent to Jesse Gray, another violent communist and an associate of Malcolm X, expressing his absolute support. We also read the following interesting quotation from MLK that you can see on your screen. So, in a real sense, the racial crisis in America is a part... of the larger world crisis. We learned that MLK's American Committee for Africa sponsored and financed the American tour of communist Holden Roberts, a violent leader of the Angolan War of National Liberation, which he began on the morning of March 15th, 1961, with the killing and dismemberment not only of a thousand whites, but also of about 8,000 Africans.

We close with a quote from MLK about how concerned he is that the newfound fearlessness of blacks will rise to violent proportions as if that wasn't the goal all along. It's in this chapter that we begin to see the true character of Martin Luther King Jr. Either he was completely ignorant of every person and organization he associated with, or he was a liar. The fact that he was an avid plagiarizer, as discussed previously, makes the latter more believable. His comparison of the racial issues in America with the struggles against colonialism and imperialism elsewhere clearly, obviously show a communist influence. Part 11, the rest of the igloo. According to Stang, the strategy is simple. You do something that drastically inconveniences people, forcing them to either negotiate with you or to be violent against you. Stang, who has now passed away, once wrote for a website called News with Views. In a two-part article entitled Uncelebrate King 2009, he provides details about how this process works, including his own travels with ex-communist and FBI informant Julia Brown, as they spoke to both black and white churches in cities before King got there, warning them of what to expect. They were effective in stopping the intended violence required by King's plan. I will provide a link to this article in the description. So again, they knew this, what Stang points out up above. And so Stang and Julia Brown started. to go around and warn the people ahead of time. They went off of the list that showed where King was going to be visiting and speaking.

And then they started speaking to churches before he got there so that the people wouldn't fall for the plan to push them into violence. Now this chapter here begins with a description of the nonviolent. quote-unquote, acts of CORE, the Congress on Racial Equality, including blocking work at construction sites, vandalizing stores, blocking bridges, and jamming stairwells in office buildings to keep people from entering or exiting. The expected result, of course, is that the people either negotiate with them or resort to violence, and if they turn to violence, you come out looking morally superior. MLK, we learned, was a member of CORE's National Advisory Committee. Some chapters of Corps had been taken over by black nationalists, black Muslims, and communists. Corps' national director was James Farmer, who refused to attend the 1963 March on Washington because he wanted to do, quote, something far more irritating, close quote. Notice the irritation being the point of their, quote unquote, nonviolent action. He said about this group, CORE, we're much more militant than Malcolm X. We're activists.

Stang provides a lengthy quotation discussing several CORE-sponsored demonstrations and the people who attended them, including the head of the 42nd Ward Communist Club, vice chairman of the Communist Party of the USA, and others. One attendee, William S. Massengale, was a former vice chairman of the Communist Party of Missouri. and communist candidate for alderman in St. Louis in 1943. He denied both being a member of Corps and being a communist. As Lenin said, the only serious organizational principle the active workers of our movement can accept is strict secrecy. Deny, deny, deny. Hundreds of known communists were arrested at the demonstrations sponsored by Corps. We learned that Eastern Corps leaders signed on to a call for a new National Socialist Youth Organization.

We also learned that, of course, CORE works with the SCLC and the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, or SNCC. This latter group received over $10,000 from the SCEF over one 18 -month period. We're also told of a letter from an officer of the SNCC to Communist James Dombrowski. head of the Communist Party at the time, of the USA, informing him that they feared to be openly identified with the SCEF. This letter was written on the letterhead of the Highlander Folk School. Another letter from the SNCC thanks Dombrowski for funds, cooperation, and, quote, certain channels of communication, close quote, made available by the SNEC. The Louisiana Joint Legislative Committee on Un-American Activities concludes that the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee and Southern Christian Leadership Conference, quote, are substantially under the control of the Communist Party through the influence of the Southern Conference Educational Fund and the communists who manage it. The Louisiana Joint Legislative Committee's report ties Martin Luther King to communist leaders. What it also does is irrevocably, tie up the violence with the nonviolence and show that both are two legs on the same bug, like we talked about earlier.

Again, the violent people needed the nonviolence to irritate everybody, like was said earlier. To further establish this point, we learned that Andrew D. Weinberger, a national vice president of the NAACP, is listed as treasurer. on the 1957 letterhead of the Emergency Civil Liberties Committee, one of the most active communist organizations in the United States at the time the book was written, and that another national vice president of the NAACP, John Wesley Dobbs, is on the board of directors for the SCEF. He signed an amicus curiae brief to the U.S. Supreme Court in behalf of the Communist Party in 1955. Again, so many ways to prove that these people have ties to these communist organizations. Surprisingly, we also learned from this report that out of 236 national directors for the NAACP, 145 have been involved in one way or another with communist enterprises. Oopsies. And that's just from the Louisiana report. The investigations of the House Committee on Un -American Activities show that between 59 officers and other leaders of the NAACP, there were associations with more than 450 communist fronts.

So they looked into 59 of their officers and other leaders, and there were associations with more than 450 communist front groups. It is important to remember, says Stang, that membership in a communist front doesn't necessarily mean that a man is a member of the communist conspiracy. The whole point of a front is to win the support for a specific limited objective of the communist program of exactly those people who are not communists and thereby give that objective a good odor or at least cover the smell. Close quote. By this logic, then, he explains that for a member of the NAACP to belong to a few communist fronts, we might be excused in assuming that he may only have been victimized. But for an official of the NAACP to belong to a dozen, that's reasonable grounds for suspicion. While we've not been given in this book any information about the formation of the NAACP, it seems that they are a perfect example of a group that was infiltrated by communists and either taken over. or led to give full support to communist objectives. This may explain some of the historic actions of the NAACP and even their stated objectives, which include securing, quote, political, educational, social, and economic equality, close quote. History.com states that known communist W.E.B. Dubois was one of the founders. Part 12, the Grand Alliance. Says Stalin, a revolutionary may sponsor a reform because he sees in it a means for linking up constitutional action with unconstitutional action because he feels he can make use of it as a screen behind which he can strengthen his secret work.

This is one of those things that comes to mind when you've got all these members of the conspiracy in leadership positions in our country. I'll just say the president as well. And people always say, well, yeah, not everything he does is wrong. Well, you know, sometimes those right things that they do are just to be used as a screen behind which they can strengthen their secret work. That's something we've got to keep in mind because that is the stated modus operandi, according to Stalin. Now, this chapter begins with Stang asking the question, what if MLK and his sodomite pal Rustin Bayard were just not... or unaware of what they were doing. He then proposes to answer this question by examining their ideas. He reminds us that the first step in the communization of the United States was to manufacture a war of national liberation, but that this would necessarily have to be based on race, whereas communists see everything in terms of economics.

Therefore, in this case, race is being used to create division and promote hostility, which hostility will make the revolution, after which the communists will slowly reorient the movement to take aim at capitalism. Have we seen that happen, particularly in recent years? I would say so. The zeitgeist is very anti-capitalist at the moment, and the messages that come across the Associated Press and all these other places are very anti -capitalist. Stang provides a quote from Rustin Bayard. who stressed that the Negroes' fight was shifting from a civil rights revolution to what he termed a social and political revolution in the United States. This would be accompanied by getting the blacks and whites to be at war with each other, and then selling the idea that they should unite against the real enemy, which of course is capitalism.

You say that yes, there is such a thing as racism, but somehow the cause of it is capitalism. Again, does that sound like it came from 2025? It does to me. We next receive a lengthy quote from MLK calling for the Negro freedom movement to unite with organized labor, which you can see on the screen here, as currently posted on the Communication Workers of America website. Communist official John Pepper wrote in 1928 about the need to draw the white workers and the poor white farmers into the struggle. The Communist Party of America must emphasize in all its campaigns the solidarity of the white and black workers. Lo and behold, Bayard Rustin set up a pilot project in Chicago to work among the poor whites and was planning another in the poverty-stricken Appalachia area with a plan to organize these people into powerful groups. During a strike against the Scripto plant, MLK stated, We have decided that now is the time to identify our movement very closely with labor. Communist authors James Ford and James Allen wrote in their book, Negroes in Soviet America, that the solidarity of the white workers and Negro masses was necessary to assure the combination of the two aspects of the American Revolution.

We learned that the Highlander Folk School was offering a course mixing union problems, strike tactics, and race relations. At this point in the book, there's a lengthy quotation from communist official Henry M. Winston, which contains the interesting assertion that they needed to, quote, assure at least the neutrality of the millions of white Americans who are rejecting, in practice, white supremacist ideologies but are not yet prepared actively to support the struggle, close quote. Has this effort been effective? How many whites rose up during the BLM protest to protect their cities, communities, neighbors, and businesses? I would say they've been neutralized. Mayor Rustin is quoted again, this time attributing some of their victories to splitting the white power structure and then advocating that we start now in winning the support of the poor whites in this country. communist gus hall sums it all up nicely at this point quote the red movement considers the negro civil rights issue not as a racial problem but as a part of the class struggle leading to the eventual communization of america he then told the top communist bosses to unite the negro movement with the labor movement now look at this interesting article from sometime within the past couple years i didn't get the date in the screen capture but it's very recent Rising poverty levels in the U.S. matter in Europe because it is the direct result of a particular form of capitalism that right-wing parties say should be adopted.

Also from the book, The Negroes in a Soviet America, we read, how does it come about that the white workers not only will but must lend their support to the struggle for Negro liberation? First of all, because the workers will not be able to overthrow capitalism unless they have the help of the Negro people. MLK advises that in order to get support from the poor whites, they seek allies, all who share their need for more jobs, better housing, better schools. He also goes on, however, to suggest that as a means of paying reparations, there should be a Bill of Rights for the disadvantaged, which should be, quote, used to attack the tenacious poverty which so paradoxically exists in the midst of plenty, close quote. For example, says the author, let's call this Bill of Rights a war on poverty. The League for Industrial Democracy issued a news bulletin announcing a new organization called the Citizens Crusade Against Poverty, which was a coalition of labor, civil rights, religious and social agency leaders in support of the abolition of poverty in America. The revelations in this chapter remind one of the videos of Black Lives Matter leadership, admitting that they are Marxists, the group itself taking circumstances out of context, blowing them up to enormous proportions and leading their followers to violence, even looting the stores of other blacks. You can see in the quote here, we will provide a link to this video in the description of this training once we share it. But you can see here where she's admitting on stage that they are trained organizers and trained Marxists.

We've also seen in very recent times the resurgence of the argument that capitalism is the root of all racism and that everything in America stems from white supremacist ideologies. This is even being taught in colleges and universities. And you can see in the screenshot top left, dismantling the white supremacy embedded in our classrooms. from an ed.gov website. This is no surprise when we learn about Marxist revolutionaries like Obama's friend Bill Ayers. Even Wikipedia acknowledges that, quote, he is known for his 1960s radical activism and his later work in, guess what, education reform, curriculum, and instruction. In the present chapter, there's much discussion about the need to evolve the Black liberation movement into one involving primarily the working class. Why do communists focus on that demographic? At the heart of communism is what they call dialectical materialism, which basically boils down to atheistic materialism.

There is no God, and all that matters is whatever you want for yourself. This begins by convincing the have-nots, This, of course, also explains why communists also focus on labor groups such as unions. It's easy to convince... that since they do all the work they should get all the profit they never mentioned that someone else often someone like themselves had to sacrifice to start the business by the machinery by the buildings etc and that in taking the job they were simply agreeing to work for that person allowing this process to take place makes it possible for others to do the same communism on the other hand always makes people equal at the bottom Of course, as Orwell's Animal Farm made clear, there's always another group that's somehow more equal than others who have the power and control over everyone else and who eat the jam and sleep in the beds while everyone else starves on the cold ground. But that's beside the point, right?

Another good question here is how one would go about assuring the neutrality of millions of white Americans towards either racism or communism. The answer to this might illuminate many things from pop culture, which is one of the only ways to reach millions of Americans with a consistent message. And since we're speaking specifically of the 1960s, drugs, sexual immorality, and the attendant problems that they produce come immediately to mind. And did you notice that all of the discussion of the civil rights leaders about getting the support of whites focuses on... whites. And one would think that if this were actually about righting wrongs, they would want the support of all whites. This is, of course, explained in the chapter since the underlying motivations were driven by communist ideals, which are economic. The Marxist underpinnings of a war on poverty become abundantly clear when you think about it. The only way for a government to win such a war is to spread the wealth around, i.e. to take from the haves and give to the have-nots. Look at the screen here. This is the most basic premise behind things like Medicare and Medicaid and many other things. If the term sounds familiar, it's because the war on poverty is the unofficial name for legislation first introduced by U.S. President Lyndon B. Johnson during his State of the Union address on January 8th, 1964. Just taking communist language and putting it into practice. Bayard Rustin informs us in this chapter that the black workers stimulated a book by Michael Harrington of the Young Socialist League, which in turn stimulated President Johnson's program. I would call that the Hegelian dialectic. Part 13, What Negroes Need.

This chapter is preceded by a quote from a letter sent into Muhammad Speaks, the official publication of the black Muslims, by a white reader. It contains this phrase, if everyone had the same amount of money and opportunity, there would be no problem. The chapter begins, however, with a discussion about capitalism's effect on poverty. Stan quotes communist John Pepper, writing all the way back in 1928, and complaining about the prosperity of blacks because they were closely tied up with white capitalists. He mentions that black banks in America at that time carried an annual volume of over $100 million and that black insurance companies had assets over $3 million. Stang responds by saying that the reason can only be that in America, in 1924 at least, the capitalism was there which made it possible for blacks and whites to advance. And if this was already the case 40 years ago, Imagine what it would be today if instead of less and less capitalism, we had gotten more and more. He then points out that in his own day, American Negroes in 1963 had a total income after taxes of almost $22 billion, and they don't have this in Ghana. He follows that with figures about how many blacks in America own homes and cars and even earned pay higher than that of executives in England and continental Europe. Again, this is in the 60s. At this point, we are reminded that the communists hate prosperous blacks as much as they hate anyone else. A great supporting quote is here provided from Manning Johnson, a black man who spent 10 years in communist leadership. He discusses how the communists call prosperous blacks tools of the white imperialists and... call them enemies of the Negro masses.

He says that they hate the example they set for other blacks in showing them how to take advantage of the countless opportunities of the free enterprise system. Stang then mentions that MLK and Bayard Rustin never mentioned the free enterprise system directly, instead spending all of their time talking about police brutality and some sort of revolution. In this chapter, we also learn that the Pasadena Police Department identified Bayard Rustin as a sexual pervert. This becomes important later on when we learn about MLK's own proclivities, remembering with whom he spent his time. I point this out because some today are being led to believe that the FBI simply made up all of their allegations against King, including his own sordid sexual affairs. In this chapter, we hear from the mouths of the people and organizations that Rustin and MLK associated with, including the League for Industrial Democracy, which describes itself as, quote, a militant educational movement which challenges those who would think and act for a new social order based on production for use and not for profit, close quote.

That quote shouldn't be too surprising if you look at the communist imagery in their poster. Wyatt T. Walker, MLK's chief of staff and friend, is on record saying that if the Negro is to be given equality, our whole economy will have to be changed, probably to some sort of socialism. Stang takes the opportunity here to point out that in socialism, you are given everything, food, housing, clothing, and medical treatment, just as you were if you happened to be a slave on the old plantation. And all you have to do in return, of course, is the work, without any chance to make a profit, just as you did if you happened to be a slave in the old plantation. But in capitalism, you are given absolutely nothing. The whole point to capitalism is simply that if the government does what it should, keeping criminals under control, he will create everything he needs by himself because he is by nature a creator. At this point in the book, Stang also points out many of the groups who have come to America, experienced prejudice, and eventually made their way into mainstream society. The Jews, Germans, Italians, Swedes, Poles, Greeks, Chinese, and Irish all suffered, all endured, and all eventually integrated without the need for some sort of socialism.

They all had the benefit of the free economy of capitalism and were not automatically frozen into serfdom by some bureaucrat's whim. MLK himself, in Stride Toward Freedom, wrote about his own reading of Karl Marx and his feeling that, quote, though modern American capitalism has greatly reduced the gap through social reforms, there was still a need for a better distribution of wealth, close quote. MLK also says in that same document that as he read Marx, he was concerned about what he called superfluous wealth. He doesn't say whose superfluous wealth worries him or how much wealth is superfluous, nor does he say who gets to decide. Stan continues. He doesn't say why it is. that the more social reforms that are carried out, the poorer and poorer the Negro become, according to the Negro leaders themselves. You can see the communist origins behind the concept of a universal basic income. Sadly, this is seriously being considered by cities and states here in the United States. In fact, a quick internet search shows that the Marxist roots are not even being mentioned in the discussion on the major sites, just that it, quote, holds tremendous promise for alleviating not only the financial burden of poverty, but also the damaging ripple effects of economic insecurity on health and family. Interestingly, one article on universal basic income, which we will link to in the description and which you can see on the screen here, opens by discussing MLK's calls for it. Quote, the solution to poverty is to abolish it directly by a now widely discussed measure. the guaranteed income.

This is, of course, an open call for the redistribution of wealth. At the end of this chapter, Stang discusses MLK's comments about desiring some form of partial Marxism. He points out that when you mix slavery and freedom, all you get is more slavery, and that if a man is only half free, he's also all slave. That there is and can be no such thing as pure collectivism. that if you start out with Marxism, you must end up with a mixed economy. This is an interesting point to ponder, considering the capitalist form of communism currently practiced in China. It is, of course, a controlled capitalism, meaning that everything still belongs to the government, but that the people are allowed the illusion of ownership of property as long as they remain good comrades. Still, it is an effective means of motivation. Part 14, Equal Rights. Alan Stang says, The structure of our form of government is a tremendous obstacle to any rapid advance of communism.

The separation of powers is nothing more than a built -in safeguard for reactionary policies. Of course, if we didn't have reactionary policies, we'd never fall for the Hegelian dialectic of problem, reaction, solution. You might also notice that today, Everything is reactionary policies. Since the struggle for equal rights consists so far of two elements, the Civil Rights Act and the War on Poverty, this chapter begins with a look at the Civil Rights Act. The author points out that the communists have always wanted one and quotes communists James Ford and James Allen, who tell us all the way back in 1935 that any act of discrimination or of prejudice against a Negro will become a crime under the revolutionary law. In 1963, the communist magazine Political Affairs called for support to be mobilized for civil rights legislation because, quote, its passage will place the role of the federal government in a new light and will thus constitute a major advance. This may be one of the most important statements you will hear tonight. So I will read it again. In 1963, the communist magazine Political Affairs called for support to be mobilized for civil rights legislation because, quote, its passage will place the role of the federal government in a new light and thus constitute a major advance. We'll get into how in just a little bit. Previously. communists had worried about the structure of our form of government complaining that it is quote a tremendous obstacle to any rapid advance like we read in the previous quote

Here follows a discussion about the American system of checks and balances and why they're so important. Stang uses the example of the states in Germany prior to Nazism. They were likewise separate, as US states are supposed to be, without any central control of a federal government. However, when Hitler was chancellor, he placed Nazis over the states and then passed laws making them directly under the control of the federal government. The Reich Minister of the Interior, Wilhelm Frick, on the screen here, explained the state governments from now on are merely administrative bodies of the Reich. Again, if that doesn't explain the U.S. at present time, I don't know what does. In their book, Blueprint for Total Federal Regimentation, Authors Satterfield and Wright, both past presidents of the American Bar Association, explained that the Civil Rights Act is 10% civil rights and 90% extension of federal executive power, extending federal control over business, industry, and individuals.

They warned that it would destroy the constitutional checks and balances between the federal government and the states. and between the federal government and the legislative and judicial branches. They also state that if enacted, the states will be little more than local governments acting as appendages of the central government and largely subject to its control. This legislation assumes a totally powerful national government with unending authority to intervene in all private affairs among men and to control. and adjust property relationships, close quote. They also warn that it will be impossible after passing the Civil Rights Act to prevent federal intervention from becoming a special privilege for political pressure groups. That is, again, everything that we're living through at the moment. States are merely appendages of the federal government. In considering the Civil Rights Act, six members of the House Committee on the Judiciary wrote that it gives, quote, almost unlimited authority by the president and his appointees to do whatever they desire. It is, in the most literal sense, revolutionary, destructive of the very essence of life as it has been lived in this country since the adoption of our Constitution, close quote.

These House members warned about the creation of the EEOC, Equal Employment Opportunity, right, with which we're all now familiar because it gave the federal government the power to, quote, police and control the hiring, discharge, compensation, conditions, and privileges of employment, which had always rightfully been under the control of the individual. They describe accurately how banks would be controlled through this act and how private property rights would be affected when buying, selling, or renting one's own property, including the fact that a federal inspector would make the call as to whether or not a decision had been racially motivated. We are reminded that when the communists took over Russia, they dictated exactly how much living space a person needed down to the centimeter. and sent other people to live in your so-called excess space. These House members also warned that the Civil Rights Act would result in federal control of the education process in the United States and have a negative effect on freedom of speech. They concluded by pointing out that the Civil Rights Act is in direct opposition to the Bill of Rights and that it would suffocate liberty in this country. For our republic cannot live without breath, and the breath of our republic is personal liberty and personal responsibility. We learn the tale of one Edward Rem, a barber who refused to cut the hair of two black people, for which he faced six months in jail. Stang points out that Webster's New Collegiate Dictionary defines a slave as one whose person and services are under the control of another as owner or master. He also points out that MLK was calling the right of refusal slavery while allowing for another man's services to fall under someone else's control and for that man to go to jail for six months. We're next reminded that principles are colorblind.

It's an abstraction, so the question of which side you're on is irrelevant. Mr. Stang then explains the principles being implemented by the Civil Rights Act and the natural extension of those principles. He mentions government control of employment and government control of housing. Again, just like the House members had mentioned. The chapter closes with a powerful reminder that in America, as James Madison tried to make clear, we have the unalienable right to be wrong. It's none of your business if someone wants to be wrong because you have the unalienable right to be wrongheaded with your own property. You can't force anyone else to agree with you and the government can't either. And if you don't like what someone does with his store, you go build your own.

This chapter is preceded by a quote from MLK stating that it is the obligation of government to move resolutely to the side of the freedom movement. Many people heard similar calls for the government to be on the right side of history during the gay marriage debates in California, as well as alluding to it being the new civil rights movement. And this entire book is about patterns, so I will leave it to you to make the connections here. With almost 60 years behind us now, many of us have grown up with civil rights legislation as an everyday thing. But the communists correctly noted that it cast the federal government's role into a new light, namely that they had the right to interfere in personal relationships and to legislate equality, redistribute wealth, create a protected class of citizen, and so forth. These are not the purview of the federal government under the Constitution, nor should they be. Also looking back these nearly 60 years, we can see how in many ways, The state governments from now on are merely administrative bodies of the federal government, just as happened in Nazi Germany. This is played out in things like Real ID, federal employment verification, and federal mandates that accompany federal handouts. The Civil Rights Act was passed on July 2, 1964, and looking back, we can see that it has been everything we were warned it would be, a massive federal intrusion into our businesses, industries, and personal lives. The government control of employment and government control of housing, warned about by the author, have all been realized.

The warning that it would give the federal government the power to control and adjust property relationships has been demonstrated in such things as citizens going to the Supreme Court to force other citizens to bake them a cake and those bakery owners being fined. It has indeed become an institutionalization of special privilege for political pressure groups. The story of Edward Rimm, the barber who refused to cut the... two black people is almost an exact duplicate of the cake situation. The issue had not been resolved at the time the author wrote this book, but the New York Times archives show that this barber had been demonstrated against earlier in the year and that the two black men in question just happened to be a factory laborer and the president of the local chapter of the NAACP.

Rem was arrested and had his license suspended. It used to be common in this country to see signs stating we reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason, which is proper in a free country as no one can rightfully dictate who you must serve. Criminalizing quote-unquote discrimination is another form of thought crimes legislation since most of the time it cannot be definitively proven. This basically amounts to the protected class citizen having a soft threat against you at all times. The principles of personal liberty and personal responsibility mentioned by the House member seem to have been long lost in this country as well. After seeing these black communists use the force of government to mandate their desires, nearly everyone has followed in their footsteps. And our corrupted representatives in Washington have been all too willing to champion those false causes at everyone else's expense. Part 15, the war on poverty.

Stang says, consider the plight of a citizen. who owns some property, and another citizen who rents it. When the government that is supposed to defend them both decides to take from one and give to the other to engineer a shift in power, that is a peaceful revolution. Now get this. This chapter begins with a discussion of President Lyndon Johnson's war on poverty. President Johnson's declaration in this new war has a familiar ring to it. Listen, the ancient enemies of mankind, disease and tolerance, illiteracy and ignorance are not always going to prevail. There is going to be a revolution. There is going to be a rising up and a throwing off of these chains. If a peaceful improvement is not possible, if a peaceful revolution is not possible, a violent adjustment is inevitable. He had the federal government spend $861.5 million in 1960s money for projects to help the poor in the ghettos in each of the riot cities and stated that these poor who need help so bad are, for the most part, the northern urban Negro. So again, squeaky wheel gets the grease, Hegelian dialectic. He also says we are going to try to take all the money that we think is unnecessarily being spent and take it from the haves and give it to the have-nots that need it so much.

Stang points out that a U.S. president should know that in a free society, one man's fortune isn't the next man's handicap. In a free society, it's the next man's opportunity to get a job and to make his own fortune. You would know that it is only the man who has who can hire the man who has not. He points out that it is envy that drives the have-nots to want the property of the haves and that it always ends up impoverishing all. A U.S. president who really wanted to destroy poverty would instead make it possible for all to produce by removing restrictions in creative men on trade, on business, and industry. Instead, the president invented the Office of Economic Opportunity directed by one R. Sgt. Shriver. who immediately asked a man named Michael Harrington to tell him how to abolish poverty. Harrington just happened to be a close associate of Bayard Rustin and a socialist who's been discussed previously in this book as the chairman of the board for the League for Industrial Democracy, which is dedicated to the abolition of capitalism. Harrington says that focusing on all poverty instead of just black, they can draw in white allies for their revolutionary cause. Stang wants us to notice that the war on poverty has something to do with civil rights, and he provides us with some quotes to that effect, including one from the executive director of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Center, stating that integration is no longer the issue.

The issue is poverty, which they claim is a political problem. We next investigate exactly what our tax dollars started paying for under the Anti-Poverty Act. One of the organizations the taxpayers began funding was Mobilization for Youth, which received almost all of its money, over $13 million initially, from the federal and city governments, with the remainder coming from the Ford Foundation. In August 1964, the New York Times reported that nine of their staff members had been members of the Communist Party or of Communist Front organizations in the 30s and 40s, according to the FBI. One year earlier, the number had been 14. None were dismissed by the organization. Their chairman denied that communists had taken over the agency and claimed that their professional abilities were all that mattered and not their political beliefs. Four days after the Times article, the FBI checked on the MFY staff again and found that at least 37 current staff members who have been busy with communist activity. The Times, for their part, published an article right before this new FBI report came out claiming that this was a witch hunt driven by right-wing criticism and that social workers feared it would lead to control over organizations that receive federal, state, or local funds. Stang points out that they are concerned that those who fund the programs will want to call the shots. They despaired over so-called McCarthyism.

Another Times article had the Associate Executive Director of the National Association of Social Workers estimating that 50% of the organization's 40,000 members have at one time belonged to groups that some would consider left-wing. The ACLU and NYCLU both declared that this was all McCarthyism and disparaged the city council president who had the temerity to wonder whether public money should be used to employ communists. They complained that the FBI was charging these employees and their organizations with, quote, guilt by association. The Community and Social Agency Workers Union argued basically that just because a few zealous employees have joined the Communist Party, why, that doesn't prove anything. Just because you're a communist doesn't prove you're a subversive. Instead, we learned that federal officials were more worried about the mounting Republican attack on the social philosophy behind mobilization for youth. MFY went on to hire an attorney to investigate itself, but then became concerned when he suggested they should fire anyone guilty of the promotion of civil disorder or illegal activity.

The New York News reported that MFY tried to force the attorney to resign and complained that attempts to learn the political leanings and backgrounds of MFY personnel would violate the employee's civil rights. Stang points out that we can learn what MFY is all about. by looking at its programs which included supporting boycotts strikes and demonstrations sponsored by known communists you can see in this screenshot here they changed their name to mobilization for justice Little cockroach action for you there. MFY also supported rent strikes for which they called in known communist Jesse Gray as a rent strike expert consultant. An MFY report entitled the Community Organization Housing Report describes the court system as real estate controlled and a tool for landlords. And they describe the purpose of their own housing program as being to organize tenants as a political force. drawing together and staffing a committee which will coordinate direct action campaigns in a militant manner, close quote. They also hired a man named Leroy McCray, a Trotskyite and member of the Socialist Workers' Party, to assist in rent strikes.

He remained employed by MFY even after his affiliations were known. Another leader of the rent strike sponsored by MFY was Esther Rand, named by the FBI in 1960 as a spy courier for the Soviet Union. After MFY's attorney released his report, there were more than 50 staff resignations, both voluntary and at the suggestion of the directors. New York City performed its own investigation during which they requested several times that MFY allowed their investigation department to question certain employees that had been reported to them by confidential sources as to their having engaged in subversive activity. They were told that any questioning would only be allowed if it was limited to their activities as an employee of MFY, which of course defeated the purpose of the questioning. The New York State Senate also released a report which announced their own findings about many members with active involvement with the Communist Party, including members of the Communist Party's youth club, a girl who took a trip to Cuba paid for by Fidel Castro at a time when there was a State Department ban on travel there, and so on, as well as members of the Progressive Labor Movement and Socialist Workers Party.

They noted that they hadn't even had time to investigate everyone they had information about. These groups are like flypaper, aren't they? The author next discusses a group called Harlem Youth Opportunities Unlimited, or HARU, who offer uniforms to boys nine and older and drill with dummy rifles. Remedial schoolwork will be disguised in the form of military manuals, it says. This program was given $118 million in federal and city funds, including $3.5 million from the mayor of New York. We next learned that both MFY and HARU were considered pilot programs to be copied throughout the United States. The New York Times says that MFY is regarded as the prototype for the community action programs envisioned by Title II of the anti-poverty bill. Of course, the leaders from several of the aforementioned organizations, including CORE, HARU, and the NAACP, took out an ad in the New York Times to complain that there was, quote, a campaign to destroy mobilization for youth and to cripple or abort other efforts to deal creatively with these problems in the city, close quote.

A Times editorial admitted that MFY had made mistakes, but more importantly, it, quote, had broken important new ground to restore the poor's sense of hope and purpose, close quote. After all of these revelations about MFY, the acting attorney general and the secretary of labor made the following comments, quote, the community action program has been endorsed by Congress. You never get anything done without someone jumping up and hollering. It's happened to mobilization. It may well happen to hard you. The important thing is to get in and get something done. It's shocking to hear about a U.S. president using such blood-red commie language as was used by President Johnson when declaring his so-called war on poverty. The goals and outcomes of this war are in line with communism, of course, so it fits, but it is still shocking. What's worse, however, is that he got away with it. Nothing in the Constitution allows for such things. In fact, it expressly disallows it. Feds have enumerated powers that do not include control of private property. Note also how the focus of those supposedly concerned over civil rights suddenly shifted to poverty. This was necessary, as stated previously by the communists themselves, to shift the focus more towards the economic side of the actual revolution. It is a known fact that Americans are the most generous nation in the world, both currently and historically.

This has been enabled by also being the most prosperous nation in the world, and all this without the government forcing us to be so. Even now, when so much of our money is taken by the government for socialist causes, millions of Americans still donate time, substance, and money to churches, charities, and causes out of what little they have left. We don't need the government to make these things happen. We do them because it's right, and we would do more if the government wasn't robbing us. In discussing program funding, it's interesting that we, the people, pay for every government program and yet have little or no say in how they are run, again, thanks to the Civil Rights Act. Guilt by association is an interesting beast. We believe that a man can have bad friends and yet theoretically still be good himself. However, we also allow people to go to jail for being an accomplice to a crime that was actually committed by someone else. It goes both ways, apparently. There's an old proverb that says, show me your friends and I will tell you what you are. This has appeared in print since at least 1828, so it's been an accepted adage for at least the past 200 years. This shows me that we as humans acknowledge the influence exerted on us by those we associate with. When we find that we do not agree with the things other people espouse, we generally tend to cease associating with them.

As the discussion turns to communism, we must use an elevated sense of caution, since it is literally a conspiracy to destroy not only America, but the whole world, and it uses secretive and subversive means in order to achieve its goals. It uses everything at its disposal to subvert and destroy the Constitution, which guarantees our freedom and seeks to supplant it with an enslaving oligarchy. To discover then that a man knows one or two communists, we might raise an eyebrow and move on. But to discover that he associates with many and that the organizations he belongs to employ and associate with many as well, we must raise alarms instead, withdraw public funding and disband the institution. While this may seem to contradict the position that there should not be thought crimes, it is not. Communism is the literal antithesis. The exact opposite of everything we cherish as Americans and their theories and philosophies entirely destructive by design of everything that has made us a free people. This is not theory either. We now have a hundred years of historical evidence and we can look to present day nations that have been enslaved by communism already. President Johnson's use of public funds to bring opportunities to so-called communities in need. may sound charitable, but it is nothing more than redistribution of wealth, which of course is the point.

Some things never change, and today we see the same so-called opportunities sucking Americans into the pit of socialism. You can see Zoran Mamdani here in the picture, who was just... mayor of new york saying that they're going to redirect city funds from corporate supermarkets to city-owned supermarkets again redistribution of wealth one of the tactics we learned about with mobilization for youth is their constant claims of police brutality as mentioned previously this is also a tactic of marxist groups like black lives matter the mention of haru's military military training of children reminds one of the videos that surfaced around the time Obama became president, featuring camouflage-clad boys from Brooklyn marching and chanting about him. For this and many other reasons, we can understand what he meant when he described himself as a quote-unquote community organizer. After reading this chapter, it should begin to be abundantly clear that none of these communist activities could have gained any ground without the concerted supporting efforts of agents, both in the federal government, and in the mainstream media.

Part 16, the revolution in the South. We just have a couple more to go. I apologize. We're going over long, but we warned you that it would. John Pepper says, in the institutions, progress has been made by radical leaders parading as advocates of free milk, food, and school books. Sadly, most of us no longer see these things as socialist programs, having become normalized over the past 60 years. That's all I knew as a kid. We begin this chapter by learning about a new organization called the Council of Federated Organizations, or COFO, made up of CORE, the SCLC, the SNCC, and the NAACP, all discussed in previous chapters, and definitively shown to be communist front groups, or as in the case of the NAACP, to at least have communists in their ranks. We are reminded of their leaders, including John Lewis, who justified violence because, it will cause something positive, close quote. Marx felt the same way, Stang reminds us. Lewis also spoke of pursuing our own scorched earth policy and burning Jim Crow to the ground nonviolently and of forcefully ridding the South of the evil of segregation. He also urged those involved in the freedom fight to bring about confrontation between the federal government and the state governments of the South.

How? By, quote, precipitating a crisis in Mississippi of such magnitude that the federal government will have to take over the state, close quote. Stang points out that this would appear to create a conflict. If self-determination is what this is all about, then why get the federal government to take over the state? He reminds the reader of what General Charles de Gaulle did in the case of Algeria, where he took over the central government of Algeria, federalized the military, and then conspired with the communists to liberate that area from France. He reminds us that the Soviets created a parallel government for Poland, a government in exile in Moscow, and that the U.S. government promised to protect and support the legitimate government. Instead, President Roosevelt met with Stalin in Yalta and gave them Poland. He reminds us that, as a senator, JFK promised support for Algeria. But as soon as he became president, he received Ben Bella as a guest in your White House. And America sent food aid to the poor starving communists in that country. He then connects the dots.

The point of self-determinism. is, of course, to create a parallel power structure, a phony government to rival the real one and claim to be legitimate while awaiting the arrival of the power to sustain it. You will remember that in 1957, President Eisenhower federalized the Arkansas National Guard and sent it into Little Rock. And in 1962, President Kennedy sent still more federal troops into Mississippi. So what we have to ask... is whether or not what's happening in the South has anything in common with what happened in Algeria. He next describes the formation in Mississippi of a political party called the Freedom Democratic Party by COFO. They're the ones that formed it. Their delegates were treated as legitimate despite their communist connections. In a brochure announcing a massive COFO operation, communist John Lewis stated that they could only win by a combination of action within the state and a heightened awareness throughout the country of the need for massive federal intervention. This massive operation was supported by a group called Students for a Democratic Society, or SDS, which itself was a part of Michael Harrington's League for Industrial Democracy. You can see here, too, that the League for Industrial Democracy was founded as a successor to the intercollegiate Socialist Society in 1921. Stank provides us with a quote from a National Republic article, Reds Train Youth to Revolt, which informs us that 445 high schools have student groups specifically to present in debates and open forum topics such as recognizing Russia, capitalism is a failure, world communism will supplant world capitalism.

Communism should be adopted in the united states and so on an sds leaflet describes building informal groups forming a counter community outside the authority structure of their immediate environment george dimitri the first communist president of bulgaria wrote about the need to form a united front among the youth in capitalist countries and unite the young generation of working people While COFO is doing their thing, the National Council of Churches is simultaneously conducting a project in majority black areas in Mississippi. They find that the main problem is the concentration of wealth among the few, e.g. on an average 5% of the farms control 50% of the farmland. This, Stang points out, is the perfect scenario for some agrarian reform. According to communist James Ford and James Allen, White people will support the new communist government in the South because it will mean that their right to land is also recognized. We move on to a brief discussion of the communist infiltration of religion, beginning with a quote from Benjamin Gitlow, a communist leader, discussing how such a thing was necessary, quote, in the war against capitalism and religion. Then we learned that the NCC brought in Miles Horton of the Highlander Folk School to train 700 youngsters to expect hostility during their program in Mississippi. Bayard Rustin also got involved training approximately 400 collegians at the Civil Rights Training School. James E. Jackson Jr., editor of the Daily Worker, a communist newspaper, was a behind-the-scenes man in much of the summer project. During the project, a white COFO worker told a television crew that, quote, we think the land should be redistributed. COFO workers also passed out writings by Robert Williams, a friend of Mao Zedong. Williams published a newsletter called The Crusader in which he stated that... firebombs, aka Molotov cocktails, lye or acid bombs made by injecting lye or acid in the metal end of light bulbs can be used extensively.

Soon afterwards, a roadblock in Louisiana turned up a substantial number of such lye bombs. A member of the SNCC was arrested in Mississippi. The New York Times reported on this incident but failed to note that this same man had been kicked out of Costa Rica a short time prior. for carrying communist literature into that country he was arrested after a riot there in which four people were killed at which he also possessed knives and an automatic pistol the san francisco examiner reported on a civil rights worker who'd been jailed in gulfport mississippi accompanied by a photo of his worried parents the parents just happened to be known communists Likewise, Newsweek reported on a young couple who were picked up by police, but they also failed to mention that the young man, Bob Mandel, was the son of William N. Mandel, a communist commentator with a long record of party activity. Arrested demonstrators received legal representation from Frank Pastana on the screen here, a member of the Communist Party, and Maynard Omerberg, a lecturer at the Communist School in Los Angeles. who also wrote for the Civil Rights Congress, which was interested in transferring our sovereignty to the United Nations. Representation was also sent by the National Lawyers Guild, first cited as a communist front in 1944, and was described by the House Committee on Un-American Activities as the foremost legal bulwark of the Communist Party, its front organizations, and controlled unions.

The National Lawyers Guild brought in communist Benjamin Smith, who was registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act as an agent of Fidel Castro. Further, they received counsel from Martin Popper, a longtime communist legal eagle. The FBI kept a check on persons involved in the council's project and found that two out of every seven volunteers who came into the project were either well-known figures in the Communist Party, or had references to organizations on the Bureau's subversive list. The quote at the beginning of this chapter illustrates the redistribution of wealth inherent in school lunch programs. As discussed earlier in the book, the Communists always seek to take a legitimate or quasi -legitimate grievance and turn it into a conflagration, an enormous issue. As also discussed earlier, there have been many groups who've been prejudiced against and segregated in U.S. history. After a time, people got used to these newcomers and they integrated into society. Because of the introduction of many blacks into the U.S. via slavery, this process was taking longer, but it was nevertheless underway. There were already voluntarily integrated churches and other places, for instance, when the so-called Civil Rights Act became law. Another fact not taught in schools is that the South, the Confederate States, already voluntarily passed laws to ban slavery in any new states to join their union, and they were already phasing slavery out of those states where it already existed. Again, this prior to the Civil War.

As mentioned in previous chapters, Blacks in the 1960s already had their own businesses and banks and so forth. This is why the Communists faced such resistance from Blacks in the beginning. They wanted peace like most people, and they saw that things were much better for blacks than they had ever been previously. They were no longer slaves, but property owners with the constitutional ability to control how that property was used like every other citizen. It should also be mentioned here, another fact not taught in schools, that many blacks who became freed from slavery became slave owners themselves. Combining this with the fact that it was other blacks who sold the original slaves that came to America, and it becomes obvious that it was never really about race to begin with. These Africans had been dominated by their enemies from other tribes and taken as slaves by these other Africans. They were already enslaved before they were sold. Many people today are taught that Abraham Lincoln was a hero for freeing the blacks from slavery, yet he said that he couldn't care less whether they were free. Look at the quotes on the screen here. My paramount object in this struggle is to save the Union and is not either to save or to destroy slavery. If I could save the Union without freeing any slave, I would do it. And if I could save it by freeing all the slaves, I would do it. And if I could save it by freeing some and leaving others alone, I would also do that. Mr. Lincoln, in his inaugural address, had said, I have no purpose. directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.

But when communist John Lewis speaks about bringing about confrontation between the federal government and the state governments of the South, he is more in line with the spirit of Lincoln, which was to forcefully assert the power of the federal government over that of the states. Back in the analysis for Chapter 12, we mentioned Bill Ayers, friend of Barack Obama and member of a terrorist group called the Weather Underground, which organized in 1969 as a faction of Students for a Democratic Society that we just discussed, largely composed of the national office leadership of SDS and their supporters. Beginning in 1974, the organization's express political goal was to create a revolutionary party to overthrow American imperialism. The revelation of high school student groups promoting communism makes a lot of sense. For one thing, this age group consists of children on the verge of adulthood who are more ignorant and inexperienced than they realize, but who are easily manipulated and prone to poor judgment and rash decisions. These are also the formative years when foundations are laid. And since constitutional principles are not being taught at home or school. These children will go on to leftist institutions of higher learning and ignorantly become activists for communist causes. The quotation from Ford and Allen about white people also greedily wanting their share of everyone else's land also contains a comment about how these people, quote, will have the benefits of free public school education, close quote.

This is a facet of our modern society. that people forget is one of the planks of the communist manifesto because it mandates that children be subjected to government indoctrination during their aforementioned formative years instead of being actually educated they are raised to fill the projected needs of industry which is also controlled by the government part 17 the agent provocateur Stalin tells us always we have a clear and precise aim towards which we strive, for one of the great merits of communism is that nothing is left to chance. We begin this chapter with a reminder of the 1963 bombing of a church in Alabama that took the lives of four little girls. The author points out that it was immediately blamed on right-wing extremism. Then he says, So twisted that to the normal American mind, it will probably seem almost... as it is absolutely imperative that you now observe however it isn't he reminds us of the marxist doctrine of thesis and this antithesis synthesis also known as problem reaction solution the hegelian dialectic i keep mentioning marxism leninism teaches he tells us that no revolution can hope to succeed unless there is an effective counter-revolution But they know they'll lose in outright battle, so their only hope is to control the opposition.

This is something that Ben has taught about in the past. Quite important to remember. For example, we learned from Lenin that under czarism, there had been a man named Sergei Vasilyevich Zubatov who organized meetings to ferret out revolutionaries and fight them. So, Lenin says, we sent members of our party into these meetings and societies. They acquired much skill in conducting propaganda and succeeded in arresting the workers from under the influence of Zubatav's agents. Says the author, Americans are by now familiar with the communist tactic of infiltrating and creating left-wing groups or fronts. They must now become familiar with the communist tactic of infiltrating and creating right-wing groups. Zubatov's agents were known as the Black Hundred, and they were openly denounced for committing crimes against the people of Russia, for conducting pogroms against the Jews, for being a, quote, right-wing extremist organization with fascist overtones. By controlling the opposition, the communists are able to confuse, divide, and neutralize it, to keep it busy at meaningless work, to find out who was in it, and to wipe them out a few at a time, but most importantly, To create the problems they say they solve and blame their opposition for creating them. We are reminded that the 1964 riots were ostensibly protesting police brutality. According to the New York News, however, a CIA official testified that infiltration of police forces and efforts to turn the public against them were favorite communist tactics. In other words, says the author, the police brutality actually exists, the communists infiltrate the police, create their own police brutality by being brutal, and then cause a riot to condemn it.

The CIA official quoted above also testified that the instructions for how to do the infiltration and for how to run the riot are contained in the same captured communist handbook. The New York News reported that at the same riots, the agitators represented both the extreme left and extreme right and that both the commies and extreme southern right-wingers have been supporting the black muslims the new york times even reported on the vietcong doing this same thing in saigon instructing their members to mingle among the people whenever a crowd gathers and to shout inflammatory slogans to whip up excitement it should be remembered that both manning johnson and julia brown were black communist agents who left the party after discovering that their Soviet contacts were also working with the supposed enemy, playing both sides against the middle. In Guyana, communist Chedi Jagan pitted his Indian faction against another of African descent. He had his progressive youth organization burn crops and homes, kill people and rape women and girls, and then blame it on the Africans.

When the Indians, again, this is the guy sitting in the chair here with JFK. When the Indians walked off the sugar plantations in protest, Africans were brought in to take their place. These were denounced as scabs by the Indians who began full-scale retribution against the Africans. Prior to this, the Indians and Africans had lived side by side for years with a minimum of friction. Stank says what we have seen here is a textbook demonstration of how a communist dictator divides and conquers. We've seen how with crimes, frame-ups, and an innocent error, he sets people who've been living in peace against each other and thereby creates the chaos he needs to take over. He then points out that we were sold the phony idea that the problem is between black Americans and white Americans when the real problem is between Americans of all colors and communists of all colors. We hear more about the right-wing extremists. the National States Rights Party, who kept showing up whenever one of these communist-controlled demonstrations took place. And the author points out that this also lends an air of legitimacy to the event. After all, if the racist Nazis are against it, shouldn't we all be for it? And if they're for the radical right, we should definitely not be.

And if they're for states' rights, we should be against it. Two members of the National States Rights Party, J.B. Stoner and Connie Lynch, always seemed to show up as agitators when MLK was present. Stan quotes another author who suggests that so well do the activities of Martin Luther King and those of Lynch and Stoner complement each other, and with such coordination, one cannot help but entertain the idea of a single control. In fact, there was a well-known incident where MLK was punched in the face and kicked, and the provocateur turned out to be yet another member of this same group, one Jerry Robinson. Stang informs us about a letter that was circulated nationwide at this time, claiming that the American Nazi Party was planning to exterminate all blacks. Interestingly, we learn that the black Muslims hate Jews as much as any Nazi ever did, and we are provided with quotations from Malcolm X to that effect. In fact, says the author, two short years before this, George Lincoln Rockwell, the number one American Nazi, was a guest speaker. by invitation from Elijah Muhammad at the Convention of the Black Muslims, where he stated that he and the American Nazi Party both believe that blacks are owed the millions of foreign aid dollars now being poured out by our nation to communist countries. We are reminded that the black Muslim publication Muhammad Speaks has previously been shown to be very pro-communist. How do you figure it? asks Stang. Here's a man. whom any American of any color would deplore and who was supposed to be against communism. And Mr. Mohammed, who isn't supposed to be against communism, invites him as an honored guest to his convention.

And there's the picture right there. You can see the two Nazis and everybody behind them is black, except maybe one or two foreheads popping up. Along the same lines, we learned about Carl and Ann Braden, who've been mentioned in previous chapters. They purchased a house in a white neighborhood and gave it to a black friend. Almost immediately, there were problems of racism like a burning cross, rocks thrown, and shots fired through the door. Some people turned up to help protest the racist treatment, one of whom was a demolitions expert for the communists in Spain during their civil war. The House gets bombed, and one of these supportive protesters is indicted and convicted. We learn from the footnotes that the bombings may have been planned to make it appear that Mr. Wade was being persecuted by white persons incensed by his moving into the neighborhood. So if you didn't catch that, the commies buy a house, put black people in it, and then commies come and bomb the house and blame it on racist whites. The 2021 march of Trump supporters on the Capitol building was intended to be peaceful, identical to all previous marches by various groups. Many were surprised then when... were broken and a woman was shot the entire march was immediately characterized as racist right-wing extremism etc used to tighten control of public discourse and demonize much of the population this event followed to a t the process outlined here of agent provocateurs similarly in the months leading up to the 2020 election Facebook pages of Native American news organizations were suddenly inundated with discussions about racist graffiti and a resurgence of white supremacist activity.

Well, I lived on the reservation concern and this was not an issue. In fact, it wasn't an issue either before or after the election, even on these same Facebook pages, but lasted just long enough to sway public opinion, particularly as Trump followers. or publicly being called racist and white supremacists. When looking up information about the National States Rights Party, we read the following, quote, party officials argued for states' rights against the advance of the civil rights movement, close quote, and they are lumped in with other groups considered as racist. No mention is made of federal overreach or violations of the Constitution necessary to implement the demands of the civil rights movement, as have been discussed in this book. Obviously, this group was controlled opposition. As Stang points out, but these vital elements are completely absent from the discussion. Reading about the black man whose home was deliberately bombed to make it seem like racists were responsible, we remind the reader that these things happen all the time and sometimes make it into the mainstream media. They are often buried quickly, but they do appear from time to time. They are never, however, shown to be tied to any groups. It is always presented as being a lone individual, despite the long history of such false flags. Part 18 and final part, it's very simple. This is very short. We're almost done.

Alan Stang tells us, on the basis of all the evidence we have seen, I charge that America's race problem and the civil rights movement supposed to end it have both been planned and conducted by the communists. The author begins this final chapter by stating that his book will probably be met with a profound silence and that eventually it will be labeled fascist and the author deemed crazy. that the whole book is filled with circumstantial evidence. He states that some people will not be happy until they see a person's official Communist Party ID card. He responds, the only thing wrong with this is that we are dealing here with a conspiracy, and the Communist Party, though very important, is, as evidenced in the countries the conspiracy has captured, only one small part of it. So the point is that to accuse the overwhelming majority of members of the conspiracy of also belonging to the Communist Party really would be a wild charge, simply because they really don't belong to the party. He goes on to explain that circumstantial evidence isn't a problem itself, you just need the right kind of circumstantial evidence. After all that he has shared in the book, he asks not what is possible, but what is probable. Quote, we are asking what explanation most reasonably satisfies these political facts in this historical context. The author next asks why secrecy is so important to the communist conspiracy.

Premier Castro explained in his speech today that he had hidden his belief in communism from the Cuban people and from his American friends for years because if it were known that the men who led the guerrilla fighting had radical ideas, All those who are making war against us now would have started it right then. They can't have people discovering that it isn't a workers movement or a people's movement or a mass movement at all. Let's read the quote on the screen. It says, Many thought that the group of revolutionary leaders was a group of leaders of conservative or non -radical ideas. And there is no doubt that had we, when we were getting strength, been known as people with very radical ideas, the social class which is fighting us today, would have fought us right then, and not only since we took power. Two more screenshots here. Stang describes his concerns about what the coming years would bring, particularly pertaining to escalating violence. He then reminds us of the violence that communists have wrought in other countries. Women forced to watch as their husbands and sons are hacked to bits. People burned alive. He reminds us that the Jews at least had places they could escape to, like America. but that there is nowhere to escape from America. But if we expose the tactics of communism, we can strengthen the American people against their ideas and psychological pressures.

He makes clear his charge that despite the involvement of some idealistic and good people, the civil rights movement is for the most part a communist operation. under the cloak of which the communists hope to capture this country, as are most of the race problems it is supposed to solve. In closing, Mr. Stang states that newspaper editors are also at fault for not doing their jobs, but that above all, the buck stops with you. The future of our country depends on what the reader does with the information he now possesses. And his final quote. From Ellen Stang, I accuse the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. of knowing all this, and yet of deliberately doing everything he can to bring all of it about to such an extent that whether he is or not in actuality a member of the communist conspiracy can only be of interest to his psychiatrist. I accuse President Kennedy and President Johnson of knowing this, but nevertheless not only closing their eyes to it, but lending a hand. And of having betrayed their oaths of office. And with that, I returned the floor back to brother Ben McClintock. Thank you very much, Rod. And I appreciate those of you that have been able to stay. And so normally, you know, it's this late. We would just kind of close up. But I wanted because you guys were so patient and were here with us the entire time. If anybody has any questions about this, they would like to ask or. Any additional light maybe to share? We will definitely give you that opportunity now just because you've been so patient with us. So please go ahead. If anybody has a question, raise your hand. I'm kind of surprised anybody's still here, actually. I'll just drop off and wait for the recording. Yeah. I have a question, Mark.

Is this book, I have it. But is it available online so I can refer people to it? It's very simple. Yeah, I mentioned last week that you can actually find it on archive.org, but I don't believe there's one that you can just download a PDF. I think they have it gatekept in their library, so you have to create an account and then check out the book. And this was one that I'd mentioned. where they have done something really funky, which is that they let you, I believe this is one where they only let you check it out for like one hour at a time. So you have to like, if you want to finish the book, you've got to actively like read it or you have to just keep checking it out. So, but it's on archive.org. You can find it there. I will try to remember to put a link to that in the description when we post this video. Yeah. I knew Mr. Stang. Yeah. was in long beach near where i used to live and he had it He had a radio show I used to listen to, and I used to go to several of his talks, and he worked closely with Robert Wilt in the early days of the Harvard Society writing for him, and among other things, people are aware of that. But there's so much you covered, and we don't really, it's kind of late to really get into this. A very great presentation. Thanks, I'm sorry for going so long. Yeah, J.D. Vance. is really playing the communist line of his background, that he was being persecuted, his family. And it's mostly subtle inferences he uses in some of his speeches. I've heard several of his speeches. And that he was persecuted because he was from the labor class, just right out of the Marxist playbook. And one of the articles you mentioned that thing wrote on Martin Luther King, do you know if that's available online? I could look. I will.

So I had to, it's not directly available. I happen to have it bookmarked from a long time ago. I went to newswithviews.com and he, Stang is no longer listed as one of their authors. So they don't have an author page. And I, when I, when I like searched his name in their search bar, nothing came up, but. His pages are still on their website if you have saved a link. So we'll put that in the show notes as well. It was a two-part article, so there will be two links for that. If there's a chance you could do it before his birthday or his holiday comes up, I appreciate it because four or five years I've exposed him on Kate Dolly's show. He's got a lot of heat. Yeah, they have very much deified him. He is a sacred cow and it's disgusting. I don't know if you've ever heard the quotes about Reagan. You know, the holiday was under Reagan's approval and during his administration. And he reportedly said he knew a lot of this about Martin Luther King. And there's so much more about how evil this man was. and the harm he did. But Reagan responded, well, we live in times I can't do anything about. We just got to go with it. Go with the flow. If that's an unprincipled... Very much so. And it's funny. It's interesting when you know who some of these big commies were.

MLK, Cesar Chavez, and everywhere you go, there's a Martin Luther King Boulevard and a Cesar Chavez Park and all this kind of stuff. Elementary school. and the school is named after yeah it makes me sick yep so in the chat right here we'll also have it on the website when we put it up but i did put the archive link and i did put an amazon link if anybody wants to buy the physical paperback oh cool cool cool thank you yeah you the archive.org one too so uh i i hadn't even seen the comments yet so jennifer uh carrie or elissa you have any thing you'd like to add thank you so much for being with us appreciate it you can just unmute if you've got a Thank you. I don't have any questions. It was very interesting. Oh, good. I'm glad you're here, Jennifer. Republican politicians, it's about as hard as finding a dodo bird to find a Republican politician that doesn't back the Civil Rights Act of 1960. Well, for one thing, even if they were a good person, that would be a death knell politically today because people are just stupid. So like we said, we've all been brainwashed to worship him. Well, I wasn't. I was actually debating people in 1964 about that constitutionality and waiting people to come over to our side. But the way Alan presented is so excellent. It is a huge destruction attack on sovereign state. rights as well as you know business and individual rights to force people to do business to force people to hire black and i'll share real quickly what my father did and this is 64 65 core came to his office he had a business he's a veterinary hospital and they demanded that he have to hire black and he simply said and they had one big black man who was about six foot six or seven three hundred pounds he was obviously he was there to intimidate And my dad just said, you get out of this office, my office immediately and never come back, or you'll regret coming back.

And they never came back. So that's a form of nullification. And we've got to stand up to this evil. That's the way to do it right there. Yeah, you just refuse to give in. It's interesting for me, just going back. I've obviously read this book before, but going back over it again to do the presentations. It is so crazy to me how much of our current reality was shaped by the passage of the Civil Rights Act. It's just insane. It's what allows hate crimes to exist. Yeah. Yeah. And that extended from blacks to gays. And, you know, and now we're going to go to Jews pretty soon that they'll, you know, it's going to go on and on and on. Well, in some ways it already has. Go online and look up who, what churches are members of the National Council of Churches, a pure communist organization. uh big churches like either the biggest or second biggest president church uh a lot of the a lot of the black churches and uh and the church i grew up in as a child and i i walked out on when i was a member and to have into my daughter was the united methodist church and their their neighbors and they were doing all sorts of communist things angela davis an obvious communist who provided the guns for the murderers uh and they funded her defense on murder charges, the church. And one thing else, they came to my dad for a donation, two ladies in the church. And he said, is that true? You're funding her defense? And they said, yes, doctor.

And he responded, well, the church will never get another penny from me the rest of my life. You know, and I forgot to mention in the presentation, if anybody recalls that um when obama was president and there was the big to do about his the black liberation church that he went to if you remember that that if there if there wasn't a more communist um religious front group i don't know what is okay well i think we should call tonight thank you so much for being here and being patient with us and this will be up in uh next day or two and we'll see you all next week At the Tree of Liberty Society, we're not just studying history. We're restoring the principles that built a free people. This movement isn't funded by corporations or politicians. It's built by people, patriots who care enough to act.

Now you can stand shoulder to shoulder with us through YouTube memberships, a simple way to strengthen the cause of liberty while gaining access to deeper discussions, exclusive content, and direct engagement with the society. As a Patriot, for just $1.99 a month, you'll carry your badge of support with the loyalty icons, custom emojis, members-only live chats, and priority replies to your comments. At the Minuteman level for just $6.99 a month, you'll get early access to new videos and all the benefits of the Patriot rank, a digital call to arms for those ready to act before the crowd. The Sons of Liberty tier at $9.99 brings you even closer. with personal shout outs, connections on social media, and every perk from the earlier levels. And for those who wish to help lead the charge, the Founders Club, at just $19.99 a month, opens up. to members-only live streams, exclusive videos, and all the rewards of the previous levels, direct access to the conversations shaping the future of liberty. If you believe liberty is worth defending, not only in word but in action, then join us, not as spectators of history, but as participants in its renewal.