Flock Cameras and Data Centers

TRANSCRIPT

Generated using A.I.; please forgive any mistakes.

Dear Heavenly Father, we thy sons and daughters come before thee at this hour of the evening to meet with Ben and to listen to his presentation and to fellowship one with another. Father, there's a lot going on in this world, a lot of things that we don't understand, and a lot of questions that we need to be more informed about. And please bless and inspire Ben's words to teach us and train us those things that will help us become more effective in our efforts. and become better servants to the cause of liberty we pray for thy blessings of peace upon us this night and thy spirit will speak to us in ways that we don't quite understand right now but will become very clear later on we ask these blessings according to our faith and love in the sacred and holy name of jesus christ amen

so talking about flock cameras and data centers they're not separate issues they are a part of the technocracy and the dangers of technocracy and the agenda of the conspiracy And everything that we're doing, of course, why are we talking about this? It's because we want to build the understanding of and adherence to the principles that have built free nations, expose the satanic conspiracy, and build an effective resistance to that conspiracy. Before we get into the training, though, there are a couple of other announcements I wanted to bring up. Right here we have, I mentioned that the New Health Order and their coffee shop, The Great Awakening. They are promoting us this month for the month of September. They have drinks named after us. The Ben McClintock, The Blood of Tyrants, I Don't Want to Be the Most Informed Person, The Concentration Camp, Samuel von Pufendorf, and Burning Down the House. I'm not sure the significance of $6.00 or $6.50, but I thought it was humorous with the 9-11 pricing on a couple of those drinks. um and what's cool is they're as a part of that they are promoting links to our website and encouraging folks to to go there to to join with us at the tree of liberty society on their tv they'll be playing our videos inside the store they'll be um and i i just mailed it off today i got it was late from the printer but i just put it in the mail today i sent them a box of these new books i sent them some posters that we have designed to put on the wall, a bunch of Slim Jims, our new tri-fold, some of our pass-along cards.

So they've got a bunch of cool material to have displayed at the shop. And then, of course, I wanted to let everybody here know that they did. She emailed me today and told me that all members of the Tree of Liberty Society using that code, DESERETTEAgain10. Get 10% off their vitamins that they have at mynho.com. So that's pretty fun. And then coming up on September 17th here in Utah, we have a Constitution Day presentation coming up where we're trying to build, you know, have a lot of people come out to it. So we've got a family that will be doing some live music. I'll be speaking on the Constitution. and nullification. And Phil Lyman will be talking about a bunch of brand new stuff on the fraud of the election and the things that blatantly illegal and criminal acts committed by key government officials. And so that's a key thing. I think it's important. Thankfully, he's not in office or running for office. And that what he's doing there and why we're having him is because he will be His presentation is all about delegitimizing those in government. And so it's right along the lines of what we talk about. So the address is there. We have it on our social media and email will be going out as well. But that's Constitution Day, September 17th. So just over a couple of weeks away. And then so those are the two other announcements I wanted to bring up before we got into our training of the AI prison planet that is being. built all around us right now. And there are a couple of different things. Because of the big backlash, you have the establishment coming back and saying that there's a PR problem. We have here, you have Donald Trump saying that the only reason that communities throughout the USA should not want data centers is if they want to end up being backwards and poor. The data centers need some PR help, he said. And that opposing data centers is a mistake. They're the most incredible buildings I've ever seen.

So that's what Trump is saying. Then we have the National Review, which is a neoconservative publication, so neocon, Trotskyite publication founded by William F. Buckley, who is a member of the Skull and Bones and an attendee of... the uh bohemian grove and they had an article that came out uh recently that talked about the don't saying don't oppose these flock cameras this is the only reliable way to ensure that you aren't being recorded is to stay inside and to draw the curtain so you know basically saying just give up on your privacy give up on your right to travel without being stalked you know if the government's stalking you Then, you know, if you don't like it, too bad or just hide in your house. That's the only option. Hide in your house or accept being stalked by the government. The cameras routinely aid in the identification and apprehension of the perpetrators of serious crimes, the location of missing persons and the recovery of stolen cars. So, you know, flat cameras are great. Who cares about privacy? Because look at all the great things that it's doing. You must be in favor of child kidnapping if you aren't in favor of flock cameras. So this is a lot of the propaganda that we're facing. And so it's essential that we know the propaganda that we're facing so that we can effectively combat it. So I want to cover another thing that's being said. I want to play a short clip.

This is... A clip on Fox News with the CEO of the Flock Company. Yeah, look, I think these are important conversations to have. I value my privacy. My family values their privacy. My employees value their privacy. But what we're talking about is safety as well. And so I think when people talk about just one of these, privacy or safety, they're prioritizing the wrong thing. What we have to prioritize as a country is compromise. How do we have our safety and how do we balance privacy? How do we balance privacy with safety, right? How do we balance our rights with the government wanting to know all of our business? But it's not a compromise between safety and liberty. We have to recognize that. People say we have to compromise and we've got to find the balance between safety and liberty. And that's just not, that's a false dichotomy. There is no balance. Safety takes a back seat to liberty. We have the famous quote from Benjamin Franklin where he says, those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. You have Thomas Jefferson says, in questions of power then, let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down. from mischief by the chains of the Constitution. So we're not going to have confidence in government to have a balance between liberty and safety.

We are going to strictly bind them down by the chains of the Constitution that strictly prohibit their ability to curtail our liberty under the guise of so-called safety. And we have here Samuel Adams said, if you love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsels or arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. So he doesn't think very highly of those that put their comfort and put their safety and their wealth above the danger. liberty, as Thomas Jefferson put it. And so no, no, this is not a balance of liberty versus safety. This is strictly about liberty, because we know that when you give up one, you give up the other. And this idea, right, everyone knew that you had privacy up until the 1960s and a certain court hearing, court ruling, everybody knew that you had privacy in public. Today, you're going to hear a lot where you don't have any expectation of privacy in public. And so if you're driving around, you just have to expect that if I can take a picture of you, the government can take a picture of you and store that and put it together with other things that you've done. Even though you're not suspected of committing a crime, they're just going to collect all that information. And you just have to accept that because you're out in public. But no, that was obscene.

And it was a when when portable cameras first came out, because people will say, well, the founding fathers didn't know about, you know, the idea of a portable camera that not only do you carry it around in your pocket as your phone like we have today, but even when portable cameras first started out, the idea of you not having privacy in public that you could have your picture taken of you was absolutely insane. And this is an example of a magazine cover where they called individuals that carried cameras around, these new portable cameras, that they were camera fiends. You were a fiend if you carried a camera around and took pictures of things in public. That was seen as a fiendish behavior that was dangerous to everyone's liberty and morality. It was immoral. to carry a camera around. The public reaction to these public cameras was intense. People carried these cameras around, snapping candid shots of strangers, were mockingly and sometimes fearfully nicknamed Kodak fiends because of the Kodak brand of camera. A phrase used to describe those seduced by the devilish pleasures of photography, the backlash wasn't just name calling. So there was more involved than this. And today it might seem quaint because We've had, you know, over 100 years of being able to have cameras that you can carry around. And most people, of course, don't use it to take, you know, we're not walking around Walmart just taking snapshots of people walking by. You would, of course, be, even though it's technically legal, supposedly, right, it is allowed by statute, I should say.

Because legal means something in compliance with natural law, which I would say this isn't, but it is in compliance with statute. But you would still be looked upon and people might actually become confrontational with you if you were to just go around taking pictures of them. But there was additional things that the public would do. The businesses and beaches in Washington Monument actually banned cameras. So even as a... As a tourist, right, going to the Washington Monument or going to the beach, you were not, when cameras were first, when portable cameras were first released, they were outlawed from you bringing them to these touristy attractions. In Britain, young men reportedly formed Vigilance Association. So like, you know, we have the, what are they called? I'm having the blank that we've talked about it all the time of the safety. What are they called? Oh my goodness. I'm having a blank anyways. Vigilant associations specifically to go around thrashing the CADS with cameras who go about at seaside places, taking snapshots of ladies emerging from the deep. That's a fairly direct answer to your question about people physically confronted or beaten for using cameras on others. Okay. So in the U.S., one writer described women on a train trying to smash the Kodak of a man secretly photographing them and shower the poor fiend with sand. So that's what they would do. So they'd have these safety societies going around to go after people that were violating their public privacy. Carmen, you had your hand raised? Yeah.

About what year was this? 1910-ish, 1920s. Thank you. And then we have this individual, Louis Brandes. He was in 1890, he wrote this article called The Right to Privacy. And it was published in the Harvard Law Review, so a mainstream publication. And he later became a member of the U.S. Supreme Court. And in this article called The Right to Privacy, he wrote, Instantaneous photographs and newspaper enterprise have invaded the sacred precincts of private and domestic life, and numerous mechanical devices threaten to make good the prediction that what is whispered in the closet shall be proclaimed from the housetops. But since the latest advances in photographic art, have rendered it possible to take pictures surreptitiously. The doctrines of contract and of trust are inadequate to support the required protection, and the law of tort must be resorted to. The right of property in its widest sense, including all possession, including all rights and privileges, and hence embracing the right to an inviolate personality, affords alone that broad basis upon which the protection which the individual demands can be rested. So this idea is saying that being able to just take a photograph of anybody without their permission, now we don't have contract anymore. We don't have the ability, what they have in contract law. And trust is basically the ability of public trust is gone unless we get involved and protect people's ability to be. private, even if they're out in public. Just because you're out in public doesn't mean you don't have the right to be able to be protected. from being stalked from either private individuals or the government. And that's really what it is, is when you're not suspected of a crime, but all of your activity is being recorded and tracked and monitored, that's stalking.

But then in the 1960s, the Communist Courts Act, in the case of Katz versus the United States, the Earl Warren Supreme Court ruled. that what a person knowingly exposes to the public, even in his own home or office, is not a subject of Fourth Amendment protection. So this is where we get the, you'll probably hear a lot of people talking about it in discussions about Flockhammers, that if you are in public, you have no reasonable expectation of privacy. That comes from this Supreme Court ruling. where if you do something where the public can see it, then you have every expectation, in fact, is the opposite of privacy, where you have none and anybody can take a picture of you, anybody can stalk you, as long as they're not, you know, if it's not the government, they can't try to harm you, but they can track all of your movements as long as you don't make menacing threats. And and that includes, of course, the government in this case. So and then now I think we should start a new trend. Instead of calling them Kodak fiends, we should call these people flock fiends. Those in government that want to keep track of photograph, video, every action that you take, we should call them flock fiends. Right. We have thousands of reported instances. of police using flock to track wives, girlfriends, political enemies, and so on in the last four years. Thousands of them. And here's a video of how the flock fiends use their cars. Because even if there's not a flock camera on a pole, these same tracking and devices are attached to police vehicles. So there's four cameras mounted on the car for the license plate reader system. It's pretty good as far as getting the correct plates. What they do is they take a picture of the license plate and then it basically queries the registered owner of the license plate. And then I have other cars. I'm one of the chase vehicles positioned either in front or behind me.

Sam's Pub Walmart area in Peoria, Arizona. And you'll see there's a little white car coming ahead right there. I'm trying to stay in front of him because he's running a license plate reader. And he's driving through the parking lot catching everybody's license plates that's here. And I think that's kind of a rotten thing. See, there he goes right there. That's a license plate reader. So now I'm getting his license plate. CK97961. And I don't know who he works for. There's no official stuff on his car stating that he works for DPS or any other place like that. And yet he's got a full license plate reader system mounted on the front of his car. And he doesn't like being followed, obviously, or being photographed because he just stopped right there. So I'm taking video of him right now. yeah he's turning his stuff off he doesn't like being videoed or anything else like that so that's just insane today on four oops oh wait sorry that didn't that video wasn't done video of him off he doesn't like fedex's secretive police force is helping cops build an ai car surveillance network 20 years ago fedex established its own police force now it's working with local police to build out an ai car surveillance network Forbes has learned the shipping and business services company is using AI tools made by Flock Safety, a $4 billion car surveillance startup, to monitor its distribution in cargo facilities across the United States. As part of the deal, FedEx is providing its Flock surveillance feeds to law enforcement, an arrangement that Flock has with at least four multi-billion dollar private companies.

But publicly available documents reveal that some local police departments are also sharing their Flock feeds with FedEx. a rare instance of a private company availing itself of a police surveillance apparatus. To civil rights activists, such close collaboration has the potential to dramatically expand Phlox Car Surveillance Network, which already spans 4,000 cities across over 40 states and some 40,000 cameras that track vehicles by license plate, make, model, color, and other identifying characteristics like dents or bumper stickers. Flock Nova is going to change the game for criminal investigations. I've heard from so many G's that they have this system and that system and that system. They know they have the data, but it's taking their analysts hours and hours to build a case. And now with Flock Nova, it's one click to one case solved. Okay. So as we see now, as the different criminal behaviors from these flock fiends become exposed, that police departments are... canceling their contracts or claiming to cancel the contracts and claiming to take the cameras down. But when we have companies like FedEx and others that are basically the private contractors that are hired out by the governments to do it, and then they just buy the data from them, then nothing is actually changed. And so it's just a way to be able to distract us to make us think that that they've listened to us when they're still getting. And so it's important that we look at our cities. Do our cities have contracts with companies like FedEx and others that use this information, this tracking information?

Yeah, thanks. I'm just looking at the comments. So what are they fighting for? When I did my presentation on including technocracy, but it was on the North American Union and Canada, I was talking about technocracy and I quoted from one of the magazines during the early part of the 1900s promoting technocracy. But there's another magazine called the Technocrats magazine that was promoting technocracy during this time period. And that are the people, the powers that shouldn't be, have used this model. And we'll look through it. It'll be amazing. how much we see this in mainstream thought and mainstream government agents, agencies, politicians promoting what they were promoting in the 1930s. See them in the cover of the magazine, 30 million out of work in 1933 or 20,000 a year income for every family. Which? So, right, they're saying that we're just going to give a universal basic income. $20,000 in 1933 a year would have been. just you know insane and so you know very very good it was something that it was it was going to be great like isn't this wonderful or would you rather have 30 million people out of work or have everybody make a bunch of money every year and so of course everybody was going to say let's just make a bunch of money and so here we have here technocracy a bloodless revolution and so it was really about promoting big government communism instead of having the bloody revolution that they saw in the Soviet Union, we're saying, no, this technocracy is going to do the same exact thing, but it's going to be bloodless.

And so everybody's going to like having this dictatorship. And so it's not going to need to be a bloody revolution like the others. Whoops, I goofed up on the fading. So we'll just get it over here on the left. The word technocracy, this is from that article, as representative of a new body of thought means government by science don't you don't you love government by science just like we saw uh during the fake pandemic it has no connotation of dictatorship by the technician no of course not it's by science it's not dictatorship it's you know how can you be a science denier technocracy is therefore a method of scientific procedure in government so it's we're just using facts and data and Facts and data, that could never be manipulated. This continent has no cause for gloom or fear of chaos, but we must face the inconvenience of change. So yes, it's going to be weird and inconvenient to change, but we've just got to face it and get over it. If the trends of the past century continue at their present rate, this continent will shortly have to decide. whether or not it is going to bequeath to its children of today and of the generations to come, a still greater debt load and an ever increasing unemployment with the result of a steadily decreasing standard of living for all. So if we don't do this, you're all going to have, you know, less and less and less employment, lower standard of living, bigger and bigger and bigger debt. Right. They could even say that. The fact that we have a $40 trillion debt today is a fact that we should have had technocracy back in the 1930s.

Bluntly speaking, technocrats have declared that the development of machinery is increasing at such a rapid pace that within a few years, so many men will have been discharged that the few remaining workers can no longer afford to support the unemployed by charity and the unemployed will rise in revolt. to take. And so basically saying that there's just not going to be enough to go around anymore. And so that's why they had the bloody revolution in the Soviet Union. Bluntly speaking, technocrats have declared that the development of machinery is increasing at such a rapid... Oh, that's why I did that, because it was a goof up. It was a double. So we see that. That's their... I think I did it twice and it was supposed to be another segment of the article. But anyways, you get the point. Sorry about that. You get the point of how they're selling it. And what the goal is, is they are going to be in charge. And what they decide is going to be so -called science-based. And you are just going to have to accept it. And so the opposition to this, we see Spencer Cox in Utah. gaslighting and using Orwellian doublespeak of saying that those that are going against this, the counties are declaring war. And so by accusing your enemy of declaring war by saying no to something, what he's saying is that he's declared war. He's declaring war and he vows funding cuts to counties defying this technocracy. If you don't want the technocracy, We are not going to fund you anymore. In fact, he said, your funding as a county is now at risk, meaning none. Anything within my power, I will stop. BNC road funds, any other state funding to counties who openly declare war on the state over these growth issues. So he was using those pronouns.

So just to make fun of him, I put those in there. But he's declaring war on any county that is saying, they are not going to go along with the data centers. And so he is very upset of any county that would say no to data centers and saying, if you say no, you are going to lose all kinds of state funding as a way to bully them to get them to do the state funding. Rod, go ahead. You got to love how they try to reframe the issue by changing the language as well. This is a growth issue. It's not about, you know, technocracy and surveillance and control. It's just a growth issue. Right. Who would be, who could be against a growth issue? Do you want people to die? What's that? Well, they use growth for tyranny. It's like growth. They do the same thing. Agenda 21 housing is a, is a so-called growth issue. All these things to get you to accept the New World Order. Sam? We should welcome it. It would sever the tie to the conspiracy. Welcome the war? Oh, yeah, absolutely. Yeah, we should welcome the defunding. Absolutely. Be like, okay, great. Thank you. It would completely sever it. Yep. They would probably take next steps. They might even threaten next after that to unincorporate the county or something insane. So the end game, what is it that they want to do? The end game is the convergence of the digital control grid, artificial intelligence, transhumanism, and social credit scoring. So we've talked about all the digital control grid. We've talked about artificial intelligence before. We've talked about social credit scoring.

But we haven't talked a lot about transhumanism in previous trainings. And so I'm not going to, this isn't going to be a bulk of it on transhumanism. We'll do that in the future. Because this is what it's all about is merging those four aspects together is essential. So we need to recognize what it is. So that way we know that we can, that we should oppose it. Because just like we saw with the flock cameras and the data centers, they are claiming that, you know, fighting crime, that they are, you know, they are going to get rid of poverty and all these other things. So you will support it. We've got to understand the selling points of how they're going to sell us in transhumanism. But Carmen, yes. With all the words that are being bandied about. Yeah. You know, it was a while before I really understood what tranny. This is different than tranny. This is different. So what is transhumanism? Right. Okay. So, yeah, we're going to get into that in just a second. Oh, okay. It's very different than the tranny movement where... pretends that he's a girl this is different okay so transhumanism we have here transhumanism is the belief that human beings can and should transcend their biological limitations through technology genetic engineering neural implants nanotechnology artificial intelligence and the merging of human consciousness with machines so that's that's transhumanism S

o Neuralink, that's Elon Musk's company where they are planting, you know, using brain chips to link humans with computers. The way that they're selling it is, of course, they're like, well, hey, look, this paraplegic, he can walk or he can talk now. And so isn't that great? And that's how they're selling it. But it's a part of this system that will be completely connected. So Micah. You're probably muted, Micah. Oh, you're not. You're just not talking. Okay. Well, if you want to talk again, go ahead and raise your hand. We'll get back to you. But then we have the CRISPR, the gene editing, and the networks that they're doing, the efforts that they are doing with that to change humans is a part of the merging. Think of the Borg from Star Trek with Neuralink and CRISPR gene editing is to be able to merge. humans with machines. And then we have here the Secretary of Health. What's his name? Robert Kennedy. Health and Human Services, I think is what he's the Secretary of. This is a tweet that he gave just a little in June of last year. He said, the mission to make America healthy again includes make American biotech accelerate. So what he's saying that right there is he's saying to make transhumanism accelerate. Micah? No? Okay. I'm sorry. I got it working. I'm sorry. I don't want to interrupt unless you want me to. I'll finish this up and then we'll put it back to you. So he says President Trump showed in his first term what happens when you unlock American science. Breakthroughs happen fast. So he's promoting the fake pandemic vaccine.

How great that is. Now we're going to do it again. We know the power of U.S. biotech. It's time to let it flourish, not tie it up in red tape. Misalignment and a process that gives the edge to foreign interests and large incumbents. We are clearing the path to transform great science into real cures at lower costs and better health for American people. Life science and biotech are the heart of that. So when, you know, they always talk about how the. The selling point to the masses is make America healthy again is getting rid of red dye number 30 and getting rid of putting labels on certain foods, which is just more government. But what it actually is, is technocracy. It's about accelerating the merger of humans with machines so that they can not only have their total information grid on the network. but then you you as an individual are on that total information grid micah i just the transhumanism like all those things that ben said is like yeah that's stuff they're doing and whatnot but and it can definitely expand the surveillance network for sure to insane heights but like at its core it's it's like the fountain of youth is transhumanism it's the bit you know there's you got all these movies where they're like uploading Huh? Dethroning God. Yeah, dethroning. Well, yeah, but... Making yourself God, basically. You don't need God. It's gaining eternal life, making yourself God without doing all the stuff that God mandates by his laws. It's obtaining eternal life without God and things that go with that. Yep. Thank you. So we have the Transhumanist Party, and they have their Transhumanist Bill of Rights. And its third version extends legal personhood to all sentient entities, including artificial intelligences and digitally augmented humans.

And so, you know, is that just some fringe movement? It's not. All of the people that, you know, that we're talking about, we have the Elon Musk's chip and whatnot. You know, these are major transhumanists and technocrats. These three are the founders of PayPal together, and they are major promoters of this so-called transhumanist Bill of Rights to be able to promote the idea of what Micah just said, which the part that the Satanists want to promote is what Micah was focusing on, was that they want evil. It's kind of like with pharmakia of being healed without God. And so we become, with transhumanism, they become, you know, gods basically without God, without living the laws that are required to be immortal. But for the plebs, for the people like us, they want us to be slaves. And so this will be the enslavement of the rest of us while they get to transcend to their godhood. supposedly so going on the offense there's a great website called d flock encourage you to look at it they have a map this is a map of all of that they tracked all of the not just the flock brand but all of the tracking in place it doesn't list all of the ones on cars and whatnot but it does list all of the cameras on poles and so you can zoom in and it's very specific this is exact You look right there in Las Vegas, where the cameras are, specifically on what streets. And so you can know what they are.

Here's an example of what some people have done with that information. These were teenagers that were accused of cutting down flat cameras in southern Utah. And I would say that it'd be a shame to put all of that responsibility on teenagers when adults should be leading the way. Another thing that we can do is we can put these stickers over the camera and exposing them to the community so that people know what's going on. We did that during the fake pandemic. We put these irremovable stickers where you literally had to either scrape the entire paint off of the sign to get rid of our sticker, exposing the fake pandemic, or remove the sign and replace it with a new sign. So that's things that we can do. You can let tweakers know that there's a lot of valuable metal inside of a flock hammering. And that can be helpful as well. But on a totally unrelated note, suppressors are now legal on guns. And that can be a tool as well. So with that, what's that? Could you explain that a little more? Well, you know, if your weapon is quieter, it can be easier to use projectiles. to take out a... Oh, you mean that part of it? No, you don't have to buy... You don't have to get the Fed's permission. You can just buy it from anybody that has it for sale. Oh, really? I sell stuff for that. I was just sure that they were going to hammer it down here any day now. We don't know how long it'll last, but at this moment, you do not have to get a permit to get a suppressor.

Excellent. Sorry to interrupt. No, you're good. Yes. I saw today a product you can buy at the hardware store. It's a spray. It's clear spray. And it blocks something. You spray it on your license plate. And you can't tell that this spray is on there. But what it does, it blocks something that... flop camera cannot pick up what it is sprayed on. And it was a brand name. It was a very famous brand name. You can get this stuff and just spray it on your license plate. And it blocks something to where the camera cannot pick up the image of your license plate. So I've seen some videos on those sprays and I Don't think that that's accurate. Those sprays I don't think work. Micah, maybe you got more information on that. They don't work. They actually make it easier for your license plate to be seen. The idea is that it's supposed to be so reflective that it washes out the image when the camera takes the picture. But the reality is that the technology that the cameras are using is very excellent and effective. And it actually makes them be able to read it better i have found some stuff where there's like uh like polarizing type lenses that you can put over the thing i could put a link in there i was thinking of buying some but i haven't still um as a side note it is in utah law it explicitly says and i've read it it says resisting surveillance is illegal like that That's literally in Utah code. So if they, I don't know what the penalties are.

Maybe it's just a ticket. Maybe they want to throw in the slammer. I don't, I don't remember. I did, I did actually find that in Utah code. So, um, I don't know what, how they could detect that. I know it used to be that the cops had, um, like the laptops in their cars were set up to the automatic license plate readers and it would display, um, the plates on their feed i would imagine that it it probably does that at least if there's some kind of error and there most certainly will be an error if you do this kind of stuff i'm i'm conjecturing a little bit there but the spray the sprays don't work they have very opposite effect so for for license plate you know what i've done personally this is me um is i don't have my plates on the car And so I've not I've only gotten pulled over in the last three years. I've gotten pulled over once. My wife's gotten pulled over once and they didn't give us a ticket. We just said, oh, it fell off. And, you know, I just haven't put it on yet. And so and then I just put it right back, you know, underneath the seat. And so that way it's it cuts down on the. ability to track you. I know there's, you've got your phone with you at all times, so there's lots of different ways where they track you, but so, but that's just one way to get around the flawed cameras, but any other comments, questions, thoughts? Well, then let's have a closing prayer and then we'll get into open forum. Micah, would you say the closing prayer for us? Definitely,

Father. Thank you for this time we've had together to learn and hopefully absorb. Please bless us with the contemplation of action and to come to resolutions and determinations for what we can and will do to destroy this evil. We're grateful to Thee, Lord, and we say these things in the name of Jesus Christ. Amen.